I like this idea and it fits in well with a strongly related idea I have for my peerverity project (which I hope to bring to Hive community soon), which includes the idea of crowdsourcing information checking.

[+] @blocktrades is joining Closing Drinks — SíSí Rooftop at The Social Hub! Set via the HiveFest XI Unconf tool

[+] @blocktrades is joining Future of Hive (Core)! Set via the HiveFest XI Unconf tool

[+] @blocktrades is joining Park Guell Morning visit! Set via the HiveFest XI Unconf tool

[+] @blocktrades is joining Developing Hive based apps! Set via the HiveFest XI Unconf tool

[+] @blocktrades is joining Opening — HiveFest XI: how this community-built edition works! Set via the HiveFest XI Unconf tool

[+] @blocktrades is joining Maybe walk through old town? Followed by a drink in the garden of Antic Theatre?! Set via the HiveFest XI Unconf tool

[+] @blocktrades is joining Core development update! Set via the HiveFest XI Unconf tool

[x] RSVP — HiveFest XI Barcelona @blocktrades is attending: FRI 18 SEPT — CONFERENCE DAY — CALL FOR TALKS FRI 18 SEPT — TOURIST WANDERING THU 17 SEPT — WELCOME DRINKS — RSVP SAT 19 SEPT — MORNING WORKSHOPS

Just for the record, I was quite surprised to see such a large amount to blocktrades, as my recollection clearly recalled that we made exactly one proposal and it was for something around 50K (it was for

Both sites worked fine for me, but your links here are broken: internally they look like for example, so they don't work from your post.

It does, but it doesn't talk to all peers just some peers. And plenty of peers are behind firewalls so not directly addressable: they can call you, you can't call them. So since you can't call them, you

Great idea! I'll be heading to the Barcelona edition, never been there before :-)

The amount of nodes isn't the same as the amount of witnesses. Witnesses are nodes that produce blocks. I run only one witness node, but I probably run upwards of 10 nodes. It's not easy to get a list

So who does get to see those notes? 😀

Side point: I don't think there's any need for people to buy Hive to defund proposals. I just pointed that is the primary mechanism we have now: stakeholders vote, and the more they hold, the more their

The most useful thing I can think of is to add support for "lite accounts" along with associated functionality for "social account" login (e.g. google and facebook style login). More

I don't think there's a crossed wire about the proposal mechanism itself. It was obvious in the original proposal that it was a mechanism to cut DHF spending. It's the justification that was used that

As I explained elsewhere, if we adopted the same signal of hbd_print_rate as you suggest, it would be to change payments from HBD to Hive of equivalent value. That's what the hbd_print_rate does: it doesn't

Yes, it's a common expiration for all governance-related actions (witness votes, proxies, proposal votes). I'm not really convinced that changing the name of Hive would affect anything right now. I think