Do you mean that all hive users would have equal downvote weight? If so, there's a problem with this. It's called a sybil attack. The problem is that one person can easily create many accounts, then vote

The whole point of this discussion is to get feedback on ways to improve curation results. We know they need improvement.

I am just a little fish dragged by the currents of the great whales. That's the wrong attitude toward life. If you want more influence in the world, strive for it. You probably consider me one of those

The point isn't to directly make some change that attracts investors directly. The idea is to improve the curation system, which in turn makes it more attractive to consume content here (because you find

Note that the "good" bots could also just discount votes by abusive voters.

Why do people "like" content anywhere?

eliminate auto voting. Seems simple enough. While I realize that might sound simple, it's not.

Several people have suggested changing the window time and the curation sharing mechanism during that time. Right now, I'm favoring a 2 hour window with equally shared rewards for votes during that time

I think you're suggesting "anonymous" downvotes. Most everyone agrees it would be an improvement, but its not easy to figure out how to do it. But it's something I'm going to think about after

What you're saying is true, but I'm not sure it would be such a bad thing, from a quality curation perspective. Manual voters would identify the good posts, then auto-vote bots would just be magnifying

We're not talking about curation trails. Those are arguably still manually curated, because someone is reading the posts before voting, hopefully. The "bad" auto-voters are the ones that just

Yes, I agree.

If we find something that seems to work with HMTs, I'm not really afraid to try it on the base token. Sure, it might not work on the base token because of differing economics. But none of this is set in

Not much time is being spent on this, we're mostly looking at things that could be done in hours or days at most. Our team is definitely primarily focused on making Hive the place for building scalable

There is some work being done on keyword searching by good-karma: But I think there's many things that can be done to improve the frontends, once we have more devs available to work on them.

The impact of reducing curation rewards isn't completely unknown, since previously they were 50% less for several years. But after reading some of the other suggestions here, I think it might be more

I'm just going by classic behavior modification theory: votes, and comments, are positive reinforcement. Generally speaking, votes and comments are definitely positive reinforcements. But when the votes

There is some code written for RC delegation now, but it still needs review, so the plan was to consider its inclusion in the next hardfork.

Most of the suggestions here are from users not developers. It's not difficult for users to make suggestions for improvements and I'm generally interested in their comments. What I'm objecting to is your

If this is your idea of constructive commentary, you're right not to waste your time. I don't find anything particularly useful in what you said above. Maybe what you're saying is "advertise"