Theo Walcott the West Ham?
I personally cant see this happening. For one i cant see Arsenal wanting to let Walcott go without replacing him first which with Arsenal just spending a big chunk of there money on Lacazette i cant see Wenger spending to much more money although i could be wrong. I also dont think West Ham can afford his wages he will be well over 100k a week which at the moment West Ham dont tend to spend that much.
I pesonally not sure on this signing, as do West Ham really need another injury prone player who will be on a ton of wages are barely plays? we already have Andy Carroll doing that year in year out. West Ham cant afford to pay someone that much money who is not playing. Although Walcott would be a very good player for West Ham standard and last season he did possibly have his best injury free season playing 37 games in all competitions scoring 19 goals.
So i personally think he is better than what we have right now but at the same time it would be a massive risk with his injury record.
Thanks to 
