Hello awesome people!
Here's a summary for the previous articles.
So far nobody offered 1 proof to back up the claim that this year' flu is so dangerous that we have to wear masks. Now we have measures that reduce our freedom that are based on zero proof. Nothing stopped our rulers to reduce our freedom with zero proof, so,
What's stopping them to continue to reduce our freedom?
They say our challenge is to flatten the curve of 1 enemy. What's our actual challenge?
Our challenge is: To Flatten the curve of our freedom loss, to Flatten the curve of our injustice.
Back to the initial question: How effective are we in overcoming our challenge?
i don't know and i don't think we're effective enough, otherwise,
Why do we have the measures of the new normal?
Some brave people work to protect our freedom.
How can we overcome our challenge as long as only some people work to protect our freedom and most people choose to do nothing?
I'm not gonna sit back and do nothing to give up our freedom. You can't be neutral on a moving train, so What are you: 1 problem or 1 solution?
1 good question might be:
What's the cause of our challenge?
When we know the cause, we might be more effective in working on the cause.
Our freedom loss is based on unconsciousness: as long as people are unconscious, they fall for any unproven theory.
How many people did you help be conscious of our challenge?
Have we ever stopped to ask ourselves this question?
How effective are we, in helping more people be conscious of our reality?
Let's suppose we reach enough people, then
Why do we have to respect measures that are based on zero proof?
Our challenge doesn't last forever. Overcoming our challenge is a matter of effectiveness.
1 more specific question might be:
When are we more effective:
When we ask for too much we cause denial = we push people further away from our reality = the opposite of helping people be conscious of our reality.
When do we ask for less:
Even when we Ask questions (Even about more obvious realities), our content is still logical and people don't respond too well to logical content, because it requires critical thinking and they don't bother with critical thinking, because it requires consciousness.
When do we ask for less:
How effective are we when we try to help people with logic?
How many people are we helping when we approach them with logic?
How many chances do we have of overcoming our challenge as long as we don't help people?
i don't know and i don't think we have enough. Do you believe:
One more curiosity?
Instead of:
Once people have 1 feel for our reality, they might be more receptive to the logical aspect of our challenge.
Right now you're reading information with the help of technology. The same technology allows you to share information. What do we achieve with these actions?
You already know multiple examples of reality oriented content from a previous article.
People can start taking action helpful for overcoming our challenge, once they're conscious of our challenge. I challenge you to show me the alternative for
Why would we first offer people emotional content?
Because offering emotional content (music, comedy) might be a more effective way to reach people with our message, in which case we help them be conscious of our reality, of our challenge.
i just shared some opinions, so it's up to you to decide what approach you use:
Thanks for visiting my blog and reading my article.
By the way: this article is part of a book.
i'm not the smartest one so i'm curious to know what's your opinion.
What do you think? How can we be more effective in overcoming our challenge?
Do you have ideas for how we can be more effective in helping people be conscious of our challenge?
You can comment below and let me know.
You can also write solution oriented articles in Hive community and share them on MeWe community and Discord community.
MeWe is a social media with no ads that also has a messenger function.