History is my weakness.
When I was young, I realized that history is written by the victors, and declined to fill my head with that nonsense.
Yet I have found that people often refer to history and that I am then out of my depth. While the principles I espouse are sound, they get lost in the details of the Victor's Assumption in the presentation of the slave, who knows more about the event, from the Victor's perspective.
Further, I find that my initial assumption, while true in a great deal of sense, was vitally lacking in curiosity. Thus, two great points of interest for me at this time are History, and coding, for also wish to enable an alternate Internet that is not censorable.
They are coinciding interests, for code is very much the predisposition of societal reactions. It's also very similar to chemistry. Biochemical code - DNA - is very much the subject of passive hypnosis (such as getting a heart transplant and suddenly craving eggs) as well as the precursors of thought, which brings us back to the idea of the Victor being the writer of history.
Since the world is holographic, no action occurs without leaving a trace of its occurrence. Therefore, it can be deduced what the true nature of the history, sans the Victor's perspective, is. As well, it is obvious to also be factored that those born under such rule will believe the stories, such as the current Americans.
What, then, would an anarcho-capitalist history course look like? Tom Wood's course comes to mind.