But the powers that be do not allow that cautious yes to happen, because greed is always there. The hunger for power is blinding. And so when humanity comes to a point where there will be technology available to make everything smoother more instantaneous and more easy, who will be able to actually access it?
Because again, will the people who are always at the bottom and always somehow seem to stay at the bottom, and they never get to reach more than two, three rungs at a time on that ladder, will they always be on those lower rungs? And so the AI will keep changing.
The world will become absolutely fascinating, except for those who cannot afford it. And so then what will happen to those people? And will humanity remain with the ones on the top or with the ones at the bottom where we'll be more in desperate situations, or how? My concern is that we are losing the basic norms of humanity while we are developing. Developing is a natural phenomenon that has to happen.
These ideas will, you know, bloom, and they will become, and we will become a stronger and fascinating world. But the consequences, and that's one of the things we were discussing in another space somewhere, is what the consequences will be. Sometimes the consequence can be side effects of different kinds, whether it is consequence of, you know, losing out on the money part, losing out access, not getting just what the cream of the crop, so are we going to go back into let them eat cake situation, or what? Because the world, if nothing else, repeats certain attributes in a cycle, a vicious cycle that keeps coming back, just in a more modern fashion, just in a modern, different way, language.
But that cycle, which is ancient, continues on in humanity. So that is where the cycle is never broken. It's just a fancier, brighter, glitchier cycle.
