I have no idea what you are talking about. I don't see how that logical picture matches what is in the post at all. Allow me to clarify: you stated some data, then came to a conclusion. Your conclusion

I was asked to leave a comment when I downvoted a post, so I did so. It wasn't meant condescendingly, it is just an explanation of why I downvoted. I can only make judgments based on the arguments presented

What are the serious effects you refer to? And how many people? On the flipside, one of my friend's mom died from COVID this year.

While it is true that VAERS reports are not proof of vaccines having killed the person that died in and of themselves, there is clearly an issue here. No, there is not. That is just a feeling you have.

Ok, just a brief brush where you totally fail, Mr. Nye. Foremost, VAERS numbers don't indicate actual causal linkage, something you would know if you spent half as much time doing research as you spent

Hey, by the way, I do love seeing rational opposing opinions on these matters. I see your heavy flags occasionally on content I digest like activist post or theouterlight and I would love to hear your

Thanks, I was curious about this. I have read some of the studies coming out of Israel, but haven't seen a similar analysis done on any of the areas in the US.

It should be obvious that covid is not just the flu. It is more contagious and 10 times more deadly. And that was the original version. We do not yet know how deadly delta variant is yet, but based on

Thanks for omitting mention of the most important detail in your source link's title: "but only four of 346 sick were hospitalized and NONE died".

It is all a big criminal hoax and you can’t stop that truth with your downvotes. Sure, doctors over the entire world are deluded, but you know the real truth.

So how would you interpret a headline that read "Bombshell: Pope admits Christians are pedophiles!" Would you interpret that as "Pope says it is possible for Christians to be pedophiles"?

Title is inaccurate clickbait. You make it sound like getting vaccinated makes you infectious. And they are not "admitting" something, they are just reporting the latest data which has been collected

I've attached a link to an article about how VAERS works, but here's the short summary that should clear up your confusion about it: AERS is intentionally set up to capture adverse events that are not

It is easy to ask questions that are hard to answer, as he apparently is doing here. But the real world data isn't showing a lot of adverse events from the vaccine. And that is the heart of the issue,

I have already seen this particular claim, it is difficult to miss when so prominently placed on his web site. But as a factual matter, none of that qualifies him to be the inventor of mRNA vaccines, which

You completely misconstrued the meaning of the CDC advice you are quoting as an argument for your position. The point of this advice was to avoid mixing-and-matching vaccines in a two dose regime (because

mRNA vaccines were invented 20 years after Malone stopped working in mRNA research. Under no established definition could he be considered the inventor of mRNA vaccines.

I decided to do some more research, and while I suppose you will believe this shows I am biased, I now suspect that the speaker either misspoke or the microphone didn't catch his words well. Based on all

But you are saying there is something interesting here. So I am asking if this is leading you to believe that their vaccinated status increased their chances for getting the virus. The insight I am seeking

From your caps, should I presume you think that their vaccinated state led to them contracting it? If so, please explain further. If not, I am not sure why you found this interesting.