During my investigation into the scam they present to us as the coronavirus pandemic, I came across numerous independent researchers and credible scientists who sharply attack the official narrative and the draconian measures that have been unleashed since the mystery virus infected the minds of dogmatic scientists, political puppets, and susceptible populations around the world.
Damn it, was that a no-brainer for them!
These parrots of scientism and their pitiful assistants in front of the cameras extol a sanctioned consensus they want to sell us as sound science. Besides those spun into the globalist network, there have been numerous viewpoints from the beginning about the novel virus, how dangerous it is, where it originated, and who is behind the whole show.
It became apparent early on that the official statistics were, at the very least, contrived. The resulting measures have no scientific basis became quickly clear to anyone capable of putting two brain cells in a row.
Initially, there was little data available. Thus, this period could have been interpreted as a learning phase. Gradually, however, more and more experts, who had smugly smiled at outrageous conspiracy theories until then, realized that something was fundamentally inconsistent in the official narrative and handling of the crisis.
The methodology of ranking random case numbers and regularly resorting to the same ineffective lockdown measures, which nevertheless had serious consequences for society and the economy, opened the eyes of even some orthodox doctors and scientists.
By this time, veteran reporters and activists were already working flat out to investigate the elaborate networks behind this cunning coup as part of a global agenda. Gradually, independent networks of journalists, researchers, and health experts formed. Continuing to grow in numbers, they are immune to the fraud and corruption we are dealing with here.
—I have a point of view on this whole issue as well.
It quickly became clear that the so-called PCR 'test' and how this tool works is key in creating the illusion of a viral pandemic. The urgent push for their new mRNA vaccines, officially labeled as 'gene therapies' before the COVID show began, is no less pernicious than the ongoing destruction of the real economy and our real-life social interactions.
And of course, as with previous frauds of this kind, though unprecedented in the current dimensions, massive conflicts of interest are involved.
Therefore, I have compared numerous scientific and historical sources. The bottom line is that I arrived to see no significant evidence of what scientists and officials sell us as a virus.
On the contrary, a growing body of information is accumulating that neither microbes nor so-called viruses are the causative agents of 'infectious disease,' which literally puts the crown on the present spectacle.
According to the experts, we are in a constant battle with invading germs, supposedly the cause of infectious disease. This doctrine was established as the 'germ theory of disease' in the late 19th century and treated as an indisputable fact within mainstream science ever since.
Of course, the pharmaceutical industry was enthusiastic about this concept from its inception and gradually turned into an oversized Moloch of expensive but dangerous treatments and preventions against the numerous diseases it soon identified.
Their dogma is and always has been that health and cure of diseases cannot come from individual behavior but must be administered by the pharmaceutical industry. As a reminder, the independence and sovereignty of the individual are once again categorically rejected.
This stubborn understanding of disease and its treatment is the basis of modern allopathic medicine—their intensely trained physicians must fight all those toxic germs.
However, numerous studies and independent research show that the commonly accepted concept of what we are taught to understand as a disease is inherently flawed and twisted. Consequently, the medical establishment's notion of infectious disease is misleading, just as contagion between alleged carriers, hosts, or spreaders seems to be a myth rather than a proven fact.
And you better believe that this unreal pandemic theatre we live through has catalyzed the exposure of inside knowledge by the medical industry cartels—or do you really think some high-level cronies don't know better?
Hence the aggressive pursuit of gene platforms; technological accelerationism and unfettered expansion of 5G infrastructure; full-throttle authoritarianism coupled with smear campaigns against the opposition to the lockdown regimes; censorship of independent scientists within the public debate; the violent breakups of public protests against the lockdown measures; flooding the gates with notorious doomsday propaganda; and naturally a digital purge of dissenting 'misinformation' on all major social platforms.
The ruling class must stifle any form of resistance to its lies through radical shock and awe tactics before evidence of scientific fraud and high-level corruption reaches the general public.
However, through my observation of a series of alleged germ-driven epidemics throughout documented history, I understood that a more solid model of health and disease had resisted the medical establishment's favored germ theory from the very beginning. It is based on experiments and observations by reputable scientists, follows logic and evidence, is universally applicable to any given condition, and considers the synergistic nature of things.
Rather than focusing on the one cause, one disease, one panacea method, it identifies living organisms as holistic entities. Inextricably linked to our natural environment, we constantly exchange physical, chemical, biological, and psychical information, not least through the aid of our internal microbial passengers.
The model I refer to became known as the 'terrain theory.' It is in direct opposition to the established germ theory of disease. Naturally, the terrain model is immune to mysophobia—the fear of germs.
Certainly, it bypasses conflicts of interest of fear campaign profiteers surrounding the evil germ image as a scapegoat for Big Pharma cartels' interests. Calling the shots on big money and global control, they cooperate with the petrochemical and the military-industrial complex, numerous biotech firms, and intelligence agencies.
All of the above benefit immensely from germ theory as the untouchable model of Rockefeller-style medical universities and indoctrinated academic science. Since then, the virus image has served as a deflection target for the numerous disease-causing factors that these lucrative industries have brought about—wilfully!
Make no mistake about it.
I have concluded that neither bacteria nor phantom viruses are the real cause of disease. The dogmatic belief that microorganisms, pejoratively referred to as germs, are the enemy of life undermines their very nature and contradicts the evolutionary process of life itself. Moreover, the concept of a virus seems to be an assumption based on the distorted perspective of germ theory rather than a proven fact.
In the shadow of the prevailing germ theory, it has been explored that germs are not the harbingers of disease but are descended from microorganisms that make up all life forms, as we shall see. Science is an ongoing process. The nature of microbiological life has not yet been explored in its entirety. Still, it is abundantly clear to the critical mind that to call the basis of life synonymous with disease is simply a fallacy. Although I am not in a position to confirm or prove this disregarded theory, for I am hardly scratching its surface, what I have got from this point of view seems to be a much more conclusive direction to think about in general.
That's the reason I want to put it this way. I am not saying that the proponents of germ theory are entirely wrong in every detail. If there were not a spark of truth in it, the germ theory would not have been able to establish itself throughout mainstream science. Still, the way these researchers arrive at their conclusions, especially when it comes to the cause of disease, urgently needs to be checked for its scientific basis. If the foundation is weak, everything that follows will not be coherent either; and I think that a much different model better explains this very basis.
I propose that we get to the root of the problem. To understand the depth of the confusion that pervades our civilization, we need to rediscover a stolen tool to repair this immense inner turmoil.
That's why I traveled back in history, where I found answers.
There is one name more than any other associated with the breakthrough of germ theory and the subsequent institutionalized research leading up to the mass distribution of vaccines.
It was the renowned French scientist Louis Pasteur (1822—1895) who undoubtedly played a significant role in the course of medical science and microbiology and, in retrospect, paved the way for the defining image of the menacing virus; that of an atmospheric invader that we must protect ourselves from—at all costs.
Now, where things start to get interesting in this story, this much-vaunted researcher Pasteur had quite a rivalry with a colleague at the French Academy of Sciences. That talented man's name was Antoine Béchamp (1816—1908)—a hardcore scientist that, contrary to Pasteur, didn't follow the attention of the 'smart set' and the privileges that come along by gaining fame from the French nobility.
We are dealing here with two completely different types. Most importantly, it was the prudent and deeply immersed Professor Béchamp who inspired his prestigious rival to break away from the theory of spontaneous generation—a then prevailing but disproven concept that living organisms spontaneously generate directly from nonliving matter. Pasteur followed his fellow researcher's experiments on fermentation and how he coped with the central problem of the French silk industry of the time, namely silkworm disease.
Contrary to the official narrative to the date, it is documented that Béchamp initially solved the riddle of fermentation of organic matter. The French Professor first proved that cane sugar gets inverted into grape sugar solely under the influence of atmospheric microorganisms by understanding that the process of fermentation involves their enzymes for nutritious purposes and the subsequent growth of molds.
Stunned by his findings, Béchamp took a closer look at these vivid ferments. In his experiments, he figured out that living organisms after death actually ferment and consequently putrefy from within through organic 'little bodies' that he found under the microscope, after which the whole debate of the terrain versus the germ theory ignited and can be traced back to.
Béchamp was most intrigued by his findings. So he gave these little fermentative agents the name 'microzymas,' meaning tiny enzymes, that would release soluble excretions he named 'zymase.' After Béchamp, these little bodies, capable of producing enzymes and thus metabolic processes, are the smallest unit of life—not cells, after Virchow and as is commonly believed. Moreover, they are virtually indestructible, thus found in primordial limestone where they potentially existed for millions of years—well and alive.
The curious Professor observed that depending on their natural terrain, they associate each other to either living cells or, 'pleomorphically,' form into zymase releasing bacteria he then named 'vibrios.'
The history books, however, give all the credits for his discoveries on fermentation to Pasteur and re zymase to the German chemist and zymologist Eduard Büchner (1860–1917), though it was again Béchamp who fully understood the nature of zymase and openly presented his findings in front of his colleagues of The Academy of Sciences many years before Büchner entered the scene.
Moreover, his most important discovery of microzymas as the actual building blocks of life, and associated with it, the emergence of diseases and so-called infections in an organism without the necessary involvement of any invading germs, were apparently ignored by the mainstream because of their implications.
If the disease originates within us, then the cure must also be found right here. But an understanding of the self and our physiological processes won't make big money.
There is a strong urge to make Béchamp obsolete, together with his followers and like-minded researchers. Their findings focus on the importance of an organism's inherent terrain and the activity of microzymas, which come by many names by now, as the basic builders and recyclers of life.
But actually, it is a waste of time to deal with this issue. We should rather trust the science instead.
Right?
These insights, however, were too much at once for Pasteur, so for his keen followers. Moreover, they would not have maintained his fame as much as the theory of invasive germs did. So, Pasteur referred to claim Béchamp's findings for himself, although for quite a long time he did not understand the role of fermentation as an actual nutritional process; what shows not least by his sudden flip-flop from spontaneous generation to germ theory.
According to Pasteur, who viewed organisms merely as a chemical vessel and firmly asserted that health emanates only from a completely sterile body, the image of the invasive germ would have once and for all "struck a lethal blow" into his former love, the spontaneous generation of life. Supposedly, he proved that "life is a germ and a germ is life," thus only atmospheric invaders are the cause of fermentative processes and therefore disease. His confident demeanor earned Pasteur the fame and financial support he needed to advance his idiosyncratic methodology for solving the then widespread problem of zymotic diseases, now labeled as infectious diseases.
The growing cult behind the germ theory felt called to release the people of the overcrowded and poorly sanitized industrial urban landscapes of the late 19th century from all their pesky little bugs and to prevent infectious disease—apart from the most obvious one of establishing a healthier, that is, a sanitized environment and hygienic medical practices, which were the real causes of the enormous decline in zymotic diseases and infant mortality. Forget about vaccines, as we shall see.
Hence, busy Pasteur, parallel to his germ theory escapades, got his hands on disease preventions by following Edward Jenner's course of inoculation and thus the notion of so-called immunization, which was underlined by germ theory. Around the time of his rabies endeavors and numerous fiascos on anthracised sheep flock and cattle, towards the end of Pasteur's active career, the Pasteur Institute, founded in Paris in 1887, was stomped out of the ground.
Thus, his legacy and the pilot for emerging vaccine research paved the way for the mass production of poison vials.
Fear of infectious diseases could thus become big business.
Mission accomplished—good job, mate!
In a nutshell, that was the story of the inception of modern germ theory and the suppression of one of its founding father's secret master—the man behind the much obscured microzymian theory. Yet, interestingly, the way the gatekeepers of germ theory digest the story tends to confuse the dates of the two French researchers' findings while denying without any relevant substance the existence and nature of Béchamp’s microzymas.
For an in-depth examination of the subject, I refer to Ethel Douglas Hume's "Béchamp or Pasteur?: A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology" [1922].
Some more extensive posts on this issue that I drafted will probably follow.
