I'm a little surprised but happy about this silent no more ethereal users spurn recovery code I think this is a good win for us in the overall cryptocurrency community guys the etherium community has broken its silence over a move to better facilitate the return of funds lost on the platform in the wake of the departure of aetherium developer yo ichi Hirai who resigned from his role supervising the software changes thursday community members have stormed github in a resounding rejection of the controversial proposal over which he left his post in the last 24 hours over 80 comments have been proposed to the blockchain network official github with most stating they do not support or are strongly opposed to aetherium improvement proposal a I P 867 which details a method to standardize the use of system-wide software upgrades to return funds lost on the platform which pretty much goes against everything around censorship resistance immutability and the most important guys centralized control theorem has already proved itself my friends to be essentially controlled coin the question is how long are we willing to accept that as a reality often occurring as a result of faulty code fund recovery is a sensitive topic for the platform having previously led the development of a rival cryptocurrency named aetherium classic which in my opinion is far superior the heat the heated response in which many are coming forward to express support for the developer makes a sharp contrast to the silence earlier this week when even some with some even writing that the proposal is a complete disgrace to the etherium community I would agree speaking on the thread developer William in trickin warned about the potential consequences of normalizing loss fund recovery recovery in comments that showcased the emerging sentiment here's the unintended consequence of having a readily available well document and standardized tool like this available he wrote others dismissed the proposal as a very damaging as well as scary and absolute joke while others another wrote that it goes against everything I thought this movement was for I think you've been whoever wrote that you've been deceived for a long time the movement has been canceled by the way if the am classic has taken the reigns the outrage also mirrors reactions observed in core developer meeting last week where aetherium developer of Vlad Zamfir spoke of the necessity for community feedback on the matter saying that e IP 867 was perhaps a too important to undergo the usually IP process all you mean like a centralized decision-making adding to the issue that this confusion has emerged over the status of the proposal which was formally entered into github first as an issue or an early stage sketch and later as a pull request a formal software outline that could become merged with the platforms live code blue scary guys james levy from tap trust one of the three developers leaving the proposal closed the github issue in the midst of activity last night sparking confusion that e IP 867 is no longer active however to date the corresponding pull request remains open and that press time continues to generate feedback well guys I think you uh pretty much know where my stance is but I want to know what your stance is let me know in the Bitcoin dot pub or the comments section below your thoughts on e IP 867 and whether it's the right thing to do to allow coin creators who lose funds through faulty code to get those funds back or is this just part of the learning experience that they just have to suck it up and deal with it while you other aetherium classic hot euler's hot along my friends if they're in plastic is going to have a fantastic year and my opinion will not have this type of nonsense and shenanigan shenanigans that's happening in the theorem isn't it nice to be part of a coin that doesn't have all the drama
