I'm listening to a conversation on Fascism, a topic that is certainly relevant lately. But I have to admit, I found myself getting frustrated with the self-imposed roadblocks distracting from the actual

I was recently watching, to my own detriment, a conversation featuring Andrew Wilson and several opposing voices. For one reason or another, he seems to be invited onto these platforms quite often. I suspect

Recently, I've been learning to have complicated conversations with strangers. Someone might wonder why I’m subjecting myself to this, but in truth, I think there is value in the skill—and that is that.

There's this new word that I've heard repeatedly as of late that I decided to look into, which is homogeneous. This can be defined with this rather common example of milk, which appears uniform to the

If I'm being critical, experiencing a plateau is more of a "why" problem than a "how" problem. I think it's often too easy to jump straight into solving for how to get out of a plateau

Der Westen sind genau so dialektische Materialisten, Marxisten, wie der Osten. Somit sind Ost & West auch keine dialektischen Gegensätze. Ganz im Gegenteil: Westen & Osten ergänzen sich vielmehr

This is based loosely on the three part Hegelian dialectic. So now there are two integrated concepts that I need to get my head around and begin to understand. It would appear that and I'll assert that

src Hi Bret, i'm wrestling with similar ideas to yourself and others of IDW ilk. i'm hoping to further my own understanding, be either validated in my potential insights or corrected, influence your thought

Notice the section on creating a limited scope of dialectics for people to argue about and discuss, all the while the communitarian synthesis has been quietly slipped into a worldwide legal infrastructure

When the Argonauts sailed on the long voyage, they were aiming to reach the golden mail, not a fatalistic one. The zeal of life overflowing from Sapho's poems pursued a tiny sign of his readers to turn

A few notes on the Hegelian Dialectic ~ original acoustic guitar and a few pirate musings ~

Expressions of absurdity In the works of Burroughs, a predominant concept is the concept of patriarchial truth. Thus, an abundance of narratives concerning not desituationism, as Baudrillard would have

矛盾所在的地方，就是哲学所在的地方。 哲学是智慧，智慧是关于思想的（世界观），也是关于行为的（方法论）。 我们都希望自己能一直昂着头，可问题是在智者面前也一直昂着头的人最后发现自己的愚蠢，最终让自己比别人矮了一截。 三人行，必有我师。 是承认人不能一直昂着头，还是接受愚蠢最终带来的后果？是短暂地低下高贵的头颅，还是耿着脖子迎接无知带来的惩罚——比人矮一截？ 一直的骄傲，最终是事实上的愚蠢。

. Excerpt of mirrored video (excerpt from 2:02 to 11:58) of "The Hegelian Dialectic: Infowars Nightly News" video published on 17 Feb 2012 on The Alex Jones Channel on YouTube URL: . THIS VIDEO

Author:

Justification Of Economic Structures & The Instrumentalization Of Superstructures |