The video explained why Wikileaks has an interest in Bitcoin. It did not explain why bitcoin has value, nor did it explain what gives it value other than fluff (eg. Freedom of expression, how your money

Thank you :)

I remember once when I could easily upload a picture from my desktop. The changes they have now made are soo difficult, I can't upload one picture even going through this method.

Can you elaborate please?

A fork will increase the price. It increases the opportunities of a coin and thus people value the coin, and the new coin also.

You should question what has made Aguar increase in value. Has anything newsworthy come out to make it increase in value, or is it just pumpers and dumpers.

lol all these fanboys. China invited the members of Ripple to discuss blockchain trends. Nothing has been set in stone, and nothing will be concrete for a long time yet. Why you ask? China is very protective

Always have 2FA activated when you can. If someone gets your password, they will not get into your account without your phone. Poloniex is safe to use, but you will need to do some math to get the orders

Can you elaborate on this please? How would you say this is a scam?

You're welcome :)

I just started using Steem also and posting a few things. Keep up the good analysis :)

One thing that should be noted. Liking other people's post and engaging with other content on steam will get you more viewers to your post. It incentiveises people to get involved in the community.

Merci beaucoup pour la presantation.

Thank you for your support. Have a great day :)

I agree, it isn't a choice. Being happy or not happy is the effect of a cause. The method is what makes you happy or unhappy. You can chose to do actions that will make you feel happy or sad, but you cannot

Thanks for the help :) Keep it up!

Awesome. Thank you for your support :)

There has been no refresh of the main rules. This still remains my opinions and commentary of ideas. Whether you decide to take up, or use any part of what I have said here, is up to you.

You should outline what makes them corrupt. Also, in your opinion, what makes them corrupt as well as the evidence to support your argument. By the way, Sigmundur resigned when he was named in the Panamar