Let's look back, I mean all the way back in time when the first humans had to interact with each other. Socialization between two similar beings had an impact as we can see today.
Take a look back at your life events. Look back and remember when you first made a friend. It’s coincidental we just had great chemistry, or it just worked.
Take for example the person you talk cryptocurrencies, sports or your feelings to.
Where did you meet them? and aren't these topics a compartment that leaves each other satisfied when engaged in? Cooperative play? Non-Cooperative?
…
Expanded Theory:
As a animal, we are meant to survive. Organisms are grouped as certain brands of survival:
Look at this we started off needing to eat, sleep and grow. Make it through the game of the jungle, savanna, desert... and give into the seed of life by giving life.
These ecosystems are a diversity of the humans. The genotype and phenotype were dependent on the environment which means epi-genetics was playing a major role in artificial/natural evolution. The chromatin remodeling birthed children as strongly as a parent when they had the child.
Macrosomia aka big baby just means that the parent's genetics have been transformed. Syndrom X... another rabbit hole.
The environment, therefore, changed the interactions between people needed to be mutual or not. Better for the group. If you made fire you were golden...and then started education.
If you were capable of killing something, with your hands, with your bat ...This started the diversification of education.
The more people that were together the better. Look at age of empires, you need militia you need to take over the map. What if the map was now all exposed...and let's say you've taken it over what happens? The game ends.
So as humans started to join together, the old rules of the game (slitting it half, to family tribes, to corporate ballers, to game players) needed to change. How would they split it between 3 people and now a child?
It didn't matter in small numbers, we all eat.
As it grew there were tasks delegated to groups of people based on their skill set. They were given rations of food for the labor. If you were self-sufficient you could help the community members. If not you were working for someone who was able to.
This made innovation.
How can I do a job efficiency- Work smart not hard--> that's the downfall of innovation is to live the dream.
When a person made fire, it didn't stop there. Look at cuisine. Innovation increased experience.
Do the job efficiently and you'll be given the best reward.
That's actually not the case. Outperforming and bringing the company more isn't incentivized unless it's a commission.
Case in mind: why have we always consider there is an ego? Unless we want to "control" ourselves.
We become an organism with too many ideas. So we need to develop a status quo, to keep the peace.
Our tools thus far needed us.
We can make it that it doesn't need us. Like a child, we care for them and hope that they can start to take care of themselves.
It's preparation to live, to survive at a level far beyond.
It could be anything, in any rabbit hole.
You choose. We just need to fuel the new tool.
-Happily Depressed
