I completely oppose the present nihilistic and suicidal 'morality' of the remaining European majority 'nations.' Issues surrounding sexuality, especially, deserve attention. First, our western societies allow and encourage the satanic rape and genital mutilation of male children—yet showing sexual love for YOUR child is 'EVIL,' and immediately results in calls for your punishment, torture, and death. Any age limits to sexuality are delusional, and all forms of physical damage to another should be considered negative regardless of age. 'Incest,' even between legal adults, is illegal in most European founded countries. Why? Because governments don't want families to love each other too much? Or, because of 'EUGENICS'? Butt, the current 'West' considers EUGENICS to be 'EVIL' and 'NAZI.' So it must be the former reason governments disapprove of 'incest.' Governments hate strong loving families. So basically, if you don't believe in eugenics there is no reason to oppose 'incest.' Now what if you are one of the few amazing people who understand that EUGENICS is the most important scientific theory ever developed? That nothing is more important than the directed (r)evolution of humankind? Then, there is still no reason to oppose 'incest' EXCEPT for reproductive 'incest,' and what is birth control~? Butt, even reproductive incest is still better than some forms of 'outcest,' like fucking the ugly, blacks, or beasts—especially, for ARYAN WOMEN, who alone are the future of the Aryan sub-species. Aryan men can impregnate whoever, butt for the Aryan sub-species to continue and improve, ARYAN WOMEN must only breed with the beautiful Aryan man. FREE-EXPRESSION on the internet is critical, without it there is no LIBERTY. Regarding FREE-EXPRESSION IRL, there should be no limits, no censorship, so long as this expression is done in private with the 'consent' of those involved. As for the issue of 'consent,' it's not complicated. If someone does not, in essence, say "NO," or "STOP," when they have the ability too, they CONSENT. What about children who are not legal adults? Well first of all, children do not 'consent' to being born. Parents can (and are encouraged to) have their infant son raped by mutilating his penis without consent. I oppose this not because of 'consent' but because it causes permanent physical-psychic harm. Children do not have the right of 'consent' about many aspects of their lives. Additionally, how is it that a child can decide to get a permanent sex-change without his/her parent's consent, yet cannot 'consent' to sex? As long as parents consent for their child, a child should be able to consent to sex, even with an adult. Finally, 'Incest' is the most direct way for families to bond. 'Incest' should be celebrated as an expression of love for those who are most dear to us!
ANDLOVEVOXXEMORE~
