A proposal is generally made to implement changes to a token/system/protocol.
Almost every proposal I have witnessed has has a vote weight included.
This almost always means the proposal goes the way of the top 10 token holders.
Almost always these top ten are project leads. They always have majority of power therefore votes go in the way they want.
We can look at Polycub/ Splinterlands (SPS) Hive these are the ones associated with the hive blockchain but there are numerous more.
So what was different about this one?
SCV did a vote to change how income was distributed. The vote had a simple criteria.
Any token holder can vote and it was a simple yes or no question.
2 ways to vote
Post or Discord.
So this may seem a bit silly to most but what's the difference between this token and any other?
Money involved
That's the only real difference nothing else, people have invested in the token with there money as they do with any other token just the numbers are a lot smaller. This could be done in a different format and scaled up but then that gives power to actual token holders and whales don't like that.
In this particular vote 100% votes Yes so that should show you how well the team is doing.
If you haven't heard about SCV yet check it out. Currently outperforming all other tokens on hive-engine
@hivebuilder/scv-proposal
Above was the proposal
Follow 
