Right, unfortunately cases like this are only exceptions, and most of the time people just follow orders without questioning whether they are right or not.

How do we know about the CMB? How do we "visualize" the CMB? We use machines to translate what we cannot perceive with our bodily senses, but which is there, and make it perceptible to our bodily

Everything we know about the cosmos is simply information that we extract mainly from images, and to a lesser extent from our other bodily senses, there is nothing we know about the cosmos that escapes

Maybe we speak two different languages. It is not possible to do what you ask of me, to give an example seen from a non-human perspective, not because it does not exist, but because I am human and I am

There is a way to differentiate the things that happen to us because we had to go through them, and the things that happen to us because we did nothing to avoid them, and that is by asking ourselves the

That's the problem when you act by force, you leave people without options, without freedom to choose, and you place everyone in a situation in which they have to be with you or against you, without middle

I disagree. The act/event is bad/evil because, on the one hand, the "perpetrator" is doing an evil, and on the other, the "victim" is suffering an evil, thus making the act evil. Evil

From the fact that a lion kills its offspring it does not follow that morality is subjective. It follows that the lion does not act according to what we call morality. Morality may very well exist in an

Thanks! :)

Lol... Many people would agree that killing one is better than killing five, but if that one is them then they wouldn't, there is even a variant of the trolley problem in which one of the options is to

:)

Well, none of those things will change if you see the glass half full, but it will change how you see them, in reality the things that happen to us are not as important as the way we react to those things.

It can also be one year older, one more year of life, it depends on whether you see the glass half empty or half full. Nothing is guaranteed. I was going to wish you happy birthday, but I don't know if

Thinking for yourself is dangerous.

Well, I will have to agree with that.

Does NOUMENON "exist" (since it's not "empirically verifiable" but remains logically necessary)? Everything exists, because nothing can not exist, because nonexistence evidently does

I see a problem with the concept of "not truth", because just as I define truth as what it is, I cannot define "not truth" as what it is not, because what it is not does not exist,

The truth is, in my opinion, what it is, how things really are, and what is true is what is related to things as they are.

So is.

Now, you could say, and might say, and probably intend to say (this specific) "A" represents the "same" concept and or object that this (other specific) "A" represents. But