Am I really free to express my opinion when something like this post is considered promoting a Ponzi scheme game?

1. I only talked about my actions and my opinions on my actions.
2. The one asserting this to be a ponzi scheme is you.
3. I did nothing to assert what others should do.

That said, I respect your willingness to play content gatekeeper here and try to clear off content that you do not like. I have no problem with you downvoting me on the basis of opinion, but I do contend that your assertion this is a ponzi scheme is far from proven and rather a sensational use of a term for something you don't agree with.

I do refer to this game as having a first-to-market advantage, because of the way it is structure is indeed as such. I would say the same about a product sold who discounts a product for those who adopt the earliest. The fact you do not see the difference suggests you're fixated on a bias in wanting to label this as something it likely isn't.