You are free to express your opinion but you were downvoted for promoting a Ponzi scheme game with an investment discussion tag after you made an investment in it. I think it's misleading to potential investors calling this unlicensed gaming operator "a short-term money manager" .

VC models are for accredited or inside investors only who usually have lawyers review the contracts, they are subject to securities laws-comparing it to a game is disingenuous.

You referred to this game as a "having a first-to-market advantage" a Ponzi scheme "generates returns for early investors by acquiring new investors" I fail to see the difference.