We always want everything we do to come out in the best possible way, and that's totally understandable. How many times do we start a project because we don't have or are great at what will be proposed?
I have a friend who learned about this by doing.
I'm a fan of the feat is better than perfect, after all I can try to improve what has already been conceived, but if I never put it into practice, I'll never know if it's actually perfect or if it needs changes.
Although in my view nothing is perfect, and everything can always be improved, even by 1%.
Going back to my friend's case, he was always a fan of if it's not perfect, better not do it. And last year he took a chance on the way I look at things, and he ended up going wrong with the project he wanted, and he got discouraged for a few weeks.
Then we sat down to talk and I managed to explain to him, that he didn't fail, but that he learned a lot from the mistake, after all, if he tried again a similar project, or even the same one, he would already know where he would have to improve, and where already has skill.
We often end up afraid to publish shallow content, or even work on an idea and can't finish it to publish the text.
I prefer to see the glass half full.
User 
