I very much appreciate the unexpected courtesy and substance of your reply. I am very happy you undertake to pay some attention to the information. I will point out a slight misunderstanding you have regarding the 'hot lots' of jabs. It is not one bad lot, but several, and split amongst manufacturers.

As you note, were it just one bad batch, that could certainly be a manufacturing problem. It's not.

Here's an article that provides specifics which seem to nominally show intent and deliberate harm. I note that folks who are dependent on their support for the jab agenda for the suppression of their inchoate anxiety will find facts that show that agenda is a crime against humanity will find such facts an intolerable threat to their felicity. Your comment I originally replied to indicated to me you were amongst that number, but this one indicates I may have misinterpreted your situation. I do hope I was wrong, and that you remain capable of being right rather than dependent on defending your position at all costs.

While we seem to write rather similarly, I note we seem to come to different conclusions. I think that's fine. I'm happy about it. If you only agree with me on everything you will never teach me anything I don't know, and that would be tragic. You have already taught me things I didn't know, and I am grateful. I hope I return the favor, and you are benefited thereby.

Thanks!