What I have seen (and that poorly translated 5 hour video was no different) is that he has some proof that very few people suffered adverse reactions, up to and including death, after receiving the vaccine. What he does not have is proof that those adverse reactions were an intentional result of the vaccine. He has proof that a bad batch of vaccines led to an abnormally high number of adverse reactions. He does not have proof that the batch of vaccines was intentionally tampered with. His belief that the distribution of different levels of vaccine components was to test the mortality threshold of the vaccine is not proof: dosage experimentation is part of the testing process for every new medication.

Let's be clear, I'm not saying that any part of this pandemic was handled well, or that all the handling was above-board. I'm saying that all of his evidence (or any of the substantiated evidence I've seen) only proves a standard level of incompetence, it doesn't come anywhere NEAR proving a depopulation agenda. HIS OWN NUMBERS do not support (in my opinion) such an agenda. If the early mortality rate of people who've received the vaccine gets over 15%, he might have a leg to stand on. Since there is no evidence yet that early mortality rate among the vaccinated is on an upward trend, I think it's unlikely to happen.

I did watch many of the videos, before your suggestion. If you had bothered to comprehend my initial comment, or look at any one of my posts outside of the d.buzz community, you could have easily surmised that. I don't just watch them, I use the LBRY desktop app and actually host them. I won't watch all of them, because I figure it's a waste of my time. They all just harp on the same evidence that several courts have already said is insufficient, and they are right!. If he presents smoking gun evidence in one, I'm sure people like yourself will make sure that it does not go unnoticed, and I'll give it a look.

If you want to know what REAL tyranny looked like during a pandemic, look back at history. Just 100 years ago, in both the US and the UK, state forces would round up whole communities, force people into isolation, and forcibly give people shots of a 'vaccine' that sometimes had a mortality rate as high as 40%. Here is just one exaple:
https://www.npr.org/2011/04/05/135121451/how-the-pox-epidemic-changed-vaccination-rules

I'll leave you with this: You're never going to be 'informed' by taking all your information from just one source (as you've suggested I do here, placing all your 'knowledge' at the feet of Dr. Fullmich), you're only going to be indoctrinated. The counter-narrative that you're adhering so devoutly to is still part of the official narrative. It's rule #1 of being in control... own both sides of the debate. Just because you're on the other side, doesn't mean you aren't being controlled.