(Perhaps the most terrifying example of lies are the behavioural modifications Cordyceps mushrooms cause their prey.)
All information can exist in a form that can harm or kill us. There are repairmen killed by intense microwaves that were not properly abated - censored - while they attempted their work, cooked by the power the information was broadcast with.
There are also lies, disinformation that can trick them that do not disprove them, and who then are vulnerable to harm concealed by lies.
But there is more as well. Hendricus G. Loos patented in the 90s means of affecting human cognition via manipulating the frequency of monitors, and the mechanism of frequency modulation is not limited to screens, but is common to all EMF mechanisms, AFAIK. For earlier iterations of such mechanisms, see the work of Jose Delgado, who developed in the late 60s chips that could be implanted into the brain to cause behaviour. He infamously demonstrated this by being charged by a bull with such a chip that he stopped in it's tracks at the press of a button. That video remains online last I checked.
I am competent to agree that regulation prohibiting blasting an individual with a maser nominal of amplitude to kill them is justified censorship, even if the frequency of the blast is modulated to encode information I, or even all humanity (a scarce statement indeed!) agree is true.
But I confess I am not competent to discern every lie from the truth. I am certain I can never be while I exist in this form. Neither can I understand the eldritch frequencies considered by Loos decades ago, and whatever form such may take today, for whatever purpose. I am incompetent to do so.
But, I am competent to oppose lies, manipulation, and usurpation of our human will to act. I hope all of us will agree we ourselves should not be misled, manipulated, or controlled to act contrary to our will.
Insofar as I can see and understand the world, we have not effectively prevented - censored - such detriments to our humanity. As well, is there merit to the white lie? Or controlling someone to guide them out of danger?
While I cannot agree either are superable justly, I have to confess that as a parent I would have used any tool at my disposal when required by circumstances to save my sons' lives. I must concur then that the motivation for committing such wrongs mitigates them, and then again confess my incompetence to parse which are tolerable and which never are, in all potential circumstances.
What censorship do you support? Why, and what recommendations do you have for me, to enable me to better be free myself, and enable my people to as well?
Thanks!