That seems pretty sensible to me, thanks!

Wait, wouldn't "unlimited editing" be kinda, like, un-block-chain-ey? Or is there some other clever implementation details I don't know about that make it not be like that? The whole premise

This is a great piece, and from the heart. Having just been really buoyed up by a friend of mine, it hits pretty close to home for me. Thanks for sharing.

CRUSH THEM! Sanity is overrated, anyways.

The argument I like to make regarding the 'inherent value' of Fiat is that you can use it to pay your taxes. And if Bitcoin and Dollars were completely the same in every single other way, except that the

I think you might have answered your own question here: review Steem (or HF 20) as if it were a new MMO or tabletop RPG. You can note which parts work, and which don’t. What the “game designers” were trying

I think you've got some decent objections. Maybe you should write it up as a post on its own? I think bots are a fact of life. Perhaps so much so that they ought to just be built-in to the system and

I have the same conundrum. I don't know when to post something to my blog, and when here. I try not to have any cross-polination - for no good reason at all whatsoever. Typically it breaks down by topic.

I have actually used the silly split-screen multitasking thing to have a Safari window on one side, and another app in the other. It's adequate? Barely. I don't think I could really do serious work that

Done!!!

These are great answers, @reggaemuffin. Anywhere you know of where I can read this level of in-depth protocol nerdery? Or would I have to go trudging through the source?

Good! I'd love to see a newer whitepaper with some of your answers in it. Or a blog post. or something.

Oh, crap. I keep using the internal stupid shit to translate things into other things. That seems stupid now that I've seen this. Thanks for this post; sounds like I have some work to do. Side note: isn't

There are usually two different ways you can read what someone has written: assuming they're smart, or assuming they're dumb. You're doing the latter, and it hurts our ability to have a decent conversation

I'm putting this in as a comment because I don't want to change my article after people have already read it. There's a fourth problem and I don't know how to handle this one, either. So let's say we have

I've argued that Inflation (mild, not-crazy) is what you want to see. What Inflation would mean is that 'old work is less useful than new work.' What deflation means is that 'old work is more useful than

Just be careful, is all. Nothing goes up like that forever. "What goes up, must come down" - Let's just take the contrary position for the sake of argument - "the price rise you're looking

I think trading on things is a perfectly reasonable thing. Buy things that are undervalued, sell when they become overvalued. Sure, fine. But I strongly reject trying to read charts for patterns. I don't

I am the big jerk, to be honest. I will absolutely buy into a dip. And I will sell if I'm nervous, or I feel the price can't be supported. And I don't really believe in the platform. I believe in

Same. We basically work for @lukestokes now. Like my posts, boss? I'm sorry I said bad things about cryptocurrency I mean "crypto"! I'll write nicer things in the future, I promise!