Login
Discover
Waves
Communities
Write
Login
Signup
trafalgar
@trafalgar
72
Satirical columnist and political commentator - I made multiple Tinder profiles just so I could right swipe myself. Alt account @traf for short content
Followers
14072
Following
52
Follow
Email digest
Resource Credits
Available
Used
Created
2017-03-21 03:12
RSS Feed
Subscribe
Comments
Blog
Posts
Comments
Communities
Wallet
trafalgar
steemit
7y
RE: Steemit Update: HF21 Testnet, SPS, EIP, Rewards API, SMTs!
Of course I wanted the EIP, that's no secret. It didn't just happen, I pushed it for over a year and finally the leadership of this chain were seeing its merits. Maybe you deem that attempting to have
$ 0.000
2
1
trafalgar
steemit
7y
RE: Steemit Update: HF21 Testnet, SPS, EIP, Rewards API, SMTs!
You seem to be implying I'm lying You absolutely certain you don't have me confused with someone else? May 14th, one of the first things I said after returning to slack chat: I'm happy to test a workers
$ 0.000
1
3
trafalgar
steemit
7y
RE: Steemit Update: HF21 Testnet, SPS, EIP, Rewards API, SMTs!
The numbers around the EIP as well as using the different measures collectively as a package was mostly my idea along with @kevingwong I have nothing to do with the SPS other than I vaguely think it's
trafalgar
steemit
7y
RE: Steemit Update: HF21 Testnet, SPS, EIP, Rewards API, SMTs!
I did fight for it. But the conversation sorta ended very abruptly for some reason. I think it was because ned suddenly said he'd support it coming from author/curation because some of the community were
trafalgar
steemit
7y
RE: Steemit Update: HF21 Testnet, SPS, EIP, Rewards API, SMTs!
Thank you. Please clarify that I'm not at all insistent on the part about SPS being lowered to 5-7% from 10%. I just think it's prudent to consider, but not a dealbreaker if we start at 10%. I'm broadly
trafalgar
steemit
7y
RE: Steemit Update: HF21 Testnet, SPS, EIP, Rewards API, SMTs!
While I'm pro 50/50, I also prefer the downvote pool to be separately delegatable, but that's more about balancing dev costs. I was strongly in favor of most of the SPS funding to come from vesting rather
trafalgar
steemit
7y
RE: Steemit Update: HF21 Testnet, SPS, EIP, Rewards API, SMTs!
The idea behind the curve is mostly to bring all profitable voting behavior into the light to be scrutinized by everyone with their free downvotes. The curve by itself is not expected to bring about honest
trafalgar
hf21
7y
RE: Secondary Effects
Very well analyzed The examples of the convergent curve should be simple enough for anyone to follow and is very helpful. I'll just add that with 50% curation and 25% downvotes, for every 'abuser' at any
trafalgar
punchline
7y
RE: The itty bitty little kitty
Economic change hopefully happening next HF Nice to see you back db
trafalgar
steem
7y
RE: EIP FAQ
You're one of the few, but hopefully growing number of people who actually really gets it. Glad to have you help explain these ideas to everyone
trafalgar
steem
7y
RE: EIP FAQ
You can't see the measures in isolation from each other, they work together. 50/50 on its own doesn't quite get us where we need to be. But in conjunction with free downvotes, poorer quality content will
trafalgar
steem
7y
RE: EIP FAQ
It's not confirmed yet unfortunately I would like the 25% free downvotes to be separately delegatable from upvotes, this partially remedies 3 problems: Insulates smaller stakeholders from retaliation -
trafalgar
hf21
7y
RE: A serious attempt at repairing the STEEM Economic Improvement Proposal (eip) for HF21
sure, you want to spread out the superlinearity more have you seen the actual curve? It's more or less doing this and is probably already too subtle I think it does what you want it to anyway, at least
trafalgar
hf21
7y
RE: A serious attempt at repairing the STEEM Economic Improvement Proposal (eip) for HF21
I see. It's similar to your other suggestions. Keep in mind that the effect we're looking for is to just deter very small votes that are trying to escape the notice of potential downvotes. We're not really
trafalgar
steem
7y
RE: EIP FAQ
Thanks appreciate the work you guys do, it's really a no win situation for you guys most of the time I'm optimistic that the EIP will work better than what most people expect, once the dust has settled
trafalgar
hf21
7y
RE: A serious attempt at repairing the STEEM Economic Improvement Proposal (eip) for HF21
The n^logn curve seems quite steep in its super-linearity The current curve being considered is (n^2+2cn) / (n + 4c) which seems to be a lot fairer as it has a subtle dent at the beginning and quickly
trafalgar
steemit
7y
RE: Out of Office ... and On My Honeymoon
Congratulations Andy! So happy for you guys! Enjoy your honeymoon!
trafalgar
steem
7y
RE: EIP FAQ
I see Then I disagree strongly with linear rewards and no curation auction window and full priced downvotes I somewhat disagree with a curation slider too Putting these all together, I'm not at all surprised
trafalgar
steem
7y
RE: EIP FAQ
Rather than taking the “high road” and leading by example approach, We did come from a place where many, including myself were voting honestly around HF 17-19. But slowly, the broken economy overwhelmed
trafalgar
steem
7y
RE: EIP FAQ
Yes I agree that when SBD goes out of wack but is still internally treated as worth roughly $1 USD, things can get a little out of hand. I vaguely recall that some improvements were made wrt the peg but
← Latest
Older →
