There is something strange that I just did not understand regarding new Rewarding Curve.
About a month ago I wrote an article about the new rewarding curve offered by 
At that time the "internal Feed Price" was approximately the same as today, $ 0.209
The curve began to be more profitable after a post received the total amount of 160K SP in upvotes or, which was the same considering the price feed, approximately $ 2 in total rewards.
Today the situation has changed a lot, although the price feed is still very similar, $ 0.204 ...
Currently, for a post to start being interesting for the content voter, the profitable inflection begins after the post reaches a sum of 640K SP or $ 8 in total rewards.
Basically a potential content curator who not only seeks exceptional content but also tries to maximize his benefits, will think twice at the time of voting ... It is not the same to upvote for a post with a balance of $3 than one with a balance of $8 since the obtained curation reward can decrease by more than 30% compared to the previous rewarding curve.
I recognize that I am not an expert in the rewarding curve algorithm but I must say that I did not expect such a large variation for such a short time and with a similar economic situation ...
Did you expect it?
Is this what you really wanted to get?
There is something here that escapes my understanding ...
...Or maybe it is that what
I'm still looking for an explanation that makes me understand why this variability is so great.
@toofasteddie