Although there are many who think the contrary, I believe that the witnesses have done what they should do, protecting all of us from a very possible danger that is the "extinction" of STEEM as a blockchain.
The best system to avoid the problem has been the launch of a new steem code neutralizing the power that the steemit INC buyer has acquired as a consequence.
Basically the new code, called Soft Fork 22.2, cancels any possibility of damaging our blockchain by preventing the stake of the accounts as 
I can understand, however, that there is no precedent in our history, nor in the history of any relevant DPoS blockchain in which most of its witnesses have chosen to implement the new code thus vetoing the accounts that presented a danger.
Some may see it as a step back in decentralization, others like myself see it as an example of self-governance and self-protection.
The situation is historic, we have moved our piece on the chess board and we have put the biggest staker in check, now it is his turn...
Let's see what 
For me it was more than clear.
The risk was too high and we reacted to mitigate it.
Any stand-by situation did not reduce the great risk of dying as a blockchain, however, the measure presented by the witnesses makes us survive in the face of hostilities.
Now more than ever, STEEM ON!
Thanks to all the witnesses who support the new code.
@toofasteddie