People of nowhere
Lie to the author of any meaning was not the case were discussed far more than extinct and not to be dangerous giants, and is said and shown it was an Indian casually, for granted. And the book is about something else. And if the current channel is suspected of falsification of facts with the aim of raising the rating, then the person publicly promising 500 years ago to send "non-existent" giant human bones to the king, can be suspected only in the idiocy. After reading his book, very difficult to do.
Traces of giants in the area and in the manuscripts of the Aztecs (Aztec codes), who lived later in these same places, in the form of drawings, and in many Mexican myths.
Drawing from Aztec manuscripts. Judging by how many people are pulling one big man, it is also very difficult. Maybe it's his head etched in stone?
Furthermore, from different sources it is clear that the ancient giants inhabited a certain territory, namely the Eastern part of Central Mexico down to the Gulf coast. It is quite reasonable to assume that the giant heads of the Olmec symbolized the victory over the race of giants and the victors erected these monuments in the centers of their cities, in order to perpetuate the memory of the vanquished predecessors. On the other hand, as such an assumption can be linked to the fact that all the giant heads of the Olmec have individual facial features?
You may be right, those researchers who believe that the giant heads were portraits of rulers? But the study of paradoxical phenomena is always complicated by the fact that such historical phenomena rarely fit into the usual system of logic. Then, they are paradoxical. Moreover, the myths, as with any historical source is exposed to the effects dictated by current political circumstances. Mexican myths were recorded by Spanish chroniclers in the sixteenth century. Information about events that occurred over tens of centuries before this time, could be transformed several times. The image of giants could be perverted in favor of the winners. Why not assume that the giants for some time were the rulers in Olmec cities? And why not assume also, that this ancient nation of giants belonged to the Negroid race?
Ancient Ossetian epic "tales of sleds" is imbued with the whole theme of the struggle sledges with the giants. They were called waihi. But what is most interesting, they were called black Waigani. Although the epic is not mentioned anywhere about the skin color of Caucasian giants, the adjective "black" in relation to Wigan, is used in the epic as a quality, not as a figurative term. Of course, such a comparison of the facts pertaining to the ancient history so distant from other peoples, may seem too bold. But our knowledge about the remote eras are too scant.
Can only remember the great poet A. S. Pushkin used in his works the rich heritage of Russian folklore. In "Ruslan and Lyudmila" the protagonist is faced with the head of a giant, free-standing in an open field and wins her. The same theme of victory over the ancient giants and the same way that giant head. And such a coincidence may not be random.
Graham Hancock in his book "Traces of gods" writes: "the Most amazing was the fact that Tres Zapotes was not a Mayan city. He was fully, exclusively, of course, the Olmec. This meant that the Olmecs, not the Maya invented the calendar that the culture of the Olmec, not Maya, is the "ancestor" of the cultures of Central America... the Olmecs are much more ancient than the Maya. They were skilled, civilized, technically advanced people, and they invented a calendar with dots and dashes, in which the origin is the mysterious date of August 13 3114 BC"
Most of the stone heads of the Olmec depicts a man with Negroid features. But 2000 years ago in the New world were not black Africans, the first of them appeared much later than the conquest, when the slave trade. However, there is solid evidence of paleo-anthropologists that as part of one of the migrations on the territory of the American continent during the last ice age really got people of the Negroid race. This migration occurred about 15 thousand years BC
In San Lorenzo the Olmecs poured artificial hill with a height of over 30 meters, as part of a huge structure with a length of 1200 meters and a width of 600 metres. Archaeologist Michael CoE during the excavation in 1966, made a number of findings, including more than twenty artificial reservoirs, linked by a very complex network of trenches, lined with basalt. Part of this network was built in the watershed. When this place was excavated, the water again began to flow out flow in heavy rains, as it happened for over three thousand years. The main drain line went from East to West. In it were embedded three auxiliary lines, and the joints were made very well from a technical point of view. Having examined the system, archaeologists were forced to admit that you can't understand the purpose of this complex system of culverts and other hydraulic structures.
The Olmecs are still a mystery to archaeologists. Failed to detect any traces of the evolution of the Olmec, like the people appeared out of nowhere. Nothing is known about the social organization, rituals and beliefs of the Olmec, in what language they spoke, which ethnic group they belonged to, has no surviving skeleton of the Olmec.
The Mayans got their calendar inherited from the Olmec, who used them for a thousand years before the Maya. But where it took Olmecs? What is the required level of technical and scientific development of civilization to develop such a calendar?
people of nowhere (continued)
Lie to the author of any meaning was not the case were discussed far more than extinct and not to be dangerous giants, and is said and shown it was an Indian casually, for granted. And the book is about something else. And if the current channel is suspected of falsification of facts with the aim of raising the rating, then the person publicly promising 500 years ago to send "non-existent" giant human bones to the king, can be suspected only in the idiocy. After reading his book, very difficult to do.
Traces of giants in the area and in the manuscripts of the Aztecs (Aztec codes), who lived later in these same places, in the form of drawings, and in many Mexican myths.
Drawing from Aztec manuscripts. Judging by how many people are pulling one big man, it is also very difficult. Maybe it's his head etched in stone?
Furthermore, from different sources it is clear that the ancient giants inhabited a certain territory, namely the Eastern part of Central Mexico down to the Gulf coast. It is quite reasonable to assume that the giant heads of the Olmec symbolized the victory over the race of giants and the victors erected these monuments in the centers of their cities, in order to perpetuate the memory of the vanquished predecessors. On the other hand, as such an assumption can be linked to the fact that all the giant heads of the Olmec have individual facial features?
You may be right, those researchers who believe that the giant heads were portraits of rulers? But the study of paradoxical phenomena is always complicated by the fact that such historical phenomena rarely fit into the usual system of logic. Then, they are paradoxical. Moreover, the myths, as with any historical source is exposed to the effects dictated by current political circumstances. Mexican myths were recorded by Spanish chroniclers in the sixteenth century. Information about events that occurred over tens of centuries before this time, could be transformed several times. The image of giants could be perverted in favor of the winners. Why not assume that the giants for some time were the rulers in Olmec cities? And why not assume also, that this ancient nation of giants belonged to the Negroid race?
Ancient Ossetian epic "tales of sleds" is imbued with the whole theme of the struggle sledges with the giants. They were called waihi. But what is most interesting, they were called black Waigani. Although the epic is not mentioned anywhere about the skin color of Caucasian giants, the adjective "black" in relation to Wigan, is used in the epic as a quality, not as a figurative term. Of course, such a comparison of the facts pertaining to the ancient history so distant from other peoples, may seem too bold. But our knowledge about the remote eras are too scant.
Can only remember the great poet A. S. Pushkin used in his works the rich heritage of Russian folklore. In "Ruslan and Lyudmila" the protagonist is faced with the head of a giant, free-standing in an open field and wins her. The same theme of victory over the ancient giants and the same way that giant head. And such a coincidence may not be random.
Graham Hancock in his book "Traces of gods" writes: "the Most amazing was the fact that Tres Zapotes was not a Mayan city. He was fully, exclusively, of course, the Olmec. This meant that the Olmecs, not the Maya invented the calendar that the culture of the Olmec, not Maya, is the "ancestor" of the of Central America... the Olmecs are much more ancient than the Maya. They were skilled, civilized, technically advanced people, and they invented a calendar with dots and dashes, in which the origin is the mysterious date of August 13 3114 BC"
Most of the stone heads of the Olmec depicts a man with Negroid features. But 2000 years ago in the New world were not black Africans, the first of them appeared much later than the conquest, when the slave trade. However, there is solid evidence of paleo-anthropologists that as part of one of the migrations on the territory of the American continent during the last ice age really got people of the Negroid race. This migration occurred about 15 thousand years BC
In San Lorenzo the Olmecs poured artificial hill with a height of over 30 meters, as part of a huge structure with a length of 1200 meters and a width of 600 metres. Archaeologist Michael CoE during the excavation in 1966, made a number of findings, including more than twenty artificial reservoirs, linked by a very complex network of trenches, lined with basalt. Part of this network was built in the watershed. When this place was excavated, the water again began to flow out flow in heavy rains, as it happened for over three thousand years. The main drain line went from East to West. In it were embedded three auxiliary lines, and the joints were made very well from a technical point of view. Having examined the system, archaeologists were forced to admit that you can't understand the purpose of this complex system of culverts and other hydraulic structures.
The Olmecs are still a mystery to archaeologists. Failed to detect any traces of the evolution of the Olmec, like the people appeared out of nowhere. Nothing is known about the social organization, rituals and beliefs of the Olmec, in what language they spoke, which ethnic group they belonged to, has no surviving skeleton of the Olmec.
The Mayans got their calendar inherited from the Olmec, who used them for a thousand years before the Maya. But where it took Olmecs? What is the required level of technical and scientific development of civilization to develop such a calendar?