"But, still, tell me how crapitalism works when nobody is poor enough to clean the toilets? Will we need trillionaires to pay the millionaires to clean them?"

If people aren't willing to clean toilets at a paltry wage the key is to increase the amount you are willing to pay for someone to do shit work. In a system of real money I'm not certain how many trillion and billionaires will exist?

At what point, under crapitalism, does the havenot stand on equal footing with the haves? When does the have not take advantage of the havenot's need to have in order to eat? Does not crapitalism presume the existence of exploiter and exploited?

Equality is a fanciful myth and it's because nobody is equally meritorious. An individual needs to fill the demand that the market (or people) require (or demand), it's that simple. Your idea of exploitation is the reality of disparity. There is no parity in nature, shit is just not equal [/fullstop]. You can try to attempt to make it equal, but it will never be. You've got to work with what you've got, and do it the best way you know how. Reality has never presumed that things and stuff and people are equal. Imagine if we tried to make sports equal, this guy jumps too high so maybe we weigh his shoes down a bit? I mean come on, where are you coming from?

"Not much crime when you have access to everything you could need."

Don't get me wrong, what you propose would me nice. But it cannot exist without enslaving people or corporations owned by people who built something, to bow to the demands of the many. When you start to do this, you create a culture that kills innovation because innovation puts a target on your back. At the very least, I'm glad that we both agree the fed needs to go, and that in and of itself will solve many of the worlds problems.