Legalizing real money for trade is half the battle.

This conversation would be academic in a sound money system.
The differences between communism and crapitalism shrink severely in such a situation.
At the point that the parties to a trade set the terms independent of bankster bs there is less room for exploitation.

But, still, tell me how crapitalism works when nobody is poor enough to clean the toilets?
Will we need trillionaires to pay the millionaires to clean them?

At what point, under crapitalism, does the havenot stand on equal footing with the haves?
When does the have not take advantage of the havenot's need to have in order to eat?

Does not crapitalism presume the existence of exploiter and exploited?

unless it's some kind of unanimous worldwide decision of many nations to abandon systems of fake money that can easily be inflated into oblivion.

This is the way to communism, too.
Not many countries don't have to trade with others to stay afloat.
Mexico could do it, but it would take a couple years to get up to speed over imported food.

Freedom Tuesday can't get here fast enough, for me.

However, so long as people have what other people want and are willing to kill and die for it, it will be forever with us, just like crime.

Not much crime when you have access to everything you could need.