Though past the date of upvoting, I would nevertheless recommend to check it out, since it ties right in with this post. It is quite obvious that opposition comes from those quarters that would see profits dwindle if people actually remain healthy or their symptoms from Covid-19 are mild due to timely treatment with effective medicines.
A poignant comment on one of the videos I am posting below says:
Apparently the one side effect of Ivermectin is that it negatively impacts the pharma wallet...
... and so it does. It is being produced cheaply and massively, mostly in India, and the costs at your neighborhood dispensary are negligibly low.
Repurposed medicines may have a role against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The antiparasitic ivermectin, with antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties, has now been tested in numerous clinical trials.
Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.
A guideline development group was convened in response to the increased international attention on ivermectin as a potential treatment for COVID-19. This group is an independent, international panel of experts, which includes clinical care experts in multiple specialties and also include an ethicist and patient-partners.
So honestly, what is the holdup? Sorry, I forgot, has to do with profits for the pharma industry ..... not much profit in it
“Ivermectin is a generic drug, so no one is going to make a lot of money, there's no windfall for any pharmaceutical company here.” Source
Now lets get to the latest, I just ran across this video by the well respected Dr. John Campbell:
Ivermectin in Australia in which he takes the Australian Government to task for some rather strange and curious justifications of forbidding doctors to prescribe Ivermectin to Covid-19 patients.
I recommend opening it on YouTube to read the description, but the comments are very interesting as well.
This was not the first time he talked about Ivermectin, a previous video about it in June 2021:
Ivermectin, Mexico, Peru, India
He appears a lot more content on this one
In my previous post, I had included Coronavirus Pandemic Update 52: Ivermectin Treatment by Dr. Seheult - a new video from September 17th 2021 discusses among many other thing also Ivermectin - he says specifically about it: we should not be writing this off!
Dr. Rhonda Patrick supports this view and also calls for more clinical studies in the USA.
this is a rather long video, to get to the section about Ivermectin, go to 01:22:32
Dr. Rhonda Patrick is a cell biologist with a Ph.D. in biomedical science from the University of Tennessee Health Science Center and St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Roger Seheult, MD is the co-founder and lead professor at https://www.medcram.com
He is an Associate Professor at the University of California, Riverside School of Medicine and Assistant Professor at Loma Linda University School of Medicine.
I am publishing this in order to again dispel the relentless attacks by the media (and it seems government sources) that appear to have a vested interests, but also by the rather dumb postings by simple minds echoing these prejudices. Corona has truly brought out the worse. Below, previously published, a collection of some of the dumbest memes connected with this (the image links to my post from 15 days ago):
On my website I maintain a information page and a blog about Corona. While I publish this one here first, I will add it in due time linking to this one in a shorter blog entry.
Visit my website ▼
PRINTS OF MY ARTWORK AVAILABLE HERE: at the Fuchs Villa in Vienna If you find this useful, please repost! MY INTRODUCTION - ABOUT MY WORK
should you not be on the blockchain, or have no upvote power, or this post is already older than 7 days, you can always just buy me a coffee.
