Not that I can consider and name off the highest point of my head, no.
The thing is, the world doesn't end all that frequently, all things considered. There are no individuals with superpowers so the reasonable dangers (meteors, a dangerous atmospheric devation, other space fiascoes) are essentially relentless. We just...hope they don't occur. What's more, the vague dangers are...well, misty. Without a level of omniscience, there's no real way to state if X political occasion or X strife could winding wild. For hell's sake, the greatest war in mankind's history was basically caused by a solitary disappointed professional killer, who really messed it up the first run through, in case I'm recollecting my history accurately.
Saying this doesn't imply that it hasn't happened. Who's to state the researchers who found microorganisms or penicillin or different things didn't adequately "spare the world?" They absolutely included a lot of life expectancy onto mankind.
Or on the other hand significantly more hard to measure (getting into the omniscience prerequisite), who knows what activities have viably spared the world? For each one expert sharpshooter that got semi-acclaimed for not slaughtering Hitler when he had the possibility, there could be 100 different officers who chose the other way. For all we know, history could be Loaded with future Pol Pots, Stalins, and Hitler's that coincidentally got shot amid their military vocation, before they found the opportunity to manufacture a following.
That is all fair theory however. The best, most essential answer is: perhaps, yet without a divine being level of comprehension of past, present, and future, its difficult to bind without a doubt.
