Thanks for clarifying. Like many, I look forward to more info on the status of SMT development.

An article that was published today recapping his recent Korea trip noted the following: "As a final bit of information, Scott also touched upon the voting system with Steemit.com and said that after

Thanks for pointing that out. This nonetheless ties to comments regarding the need for improved direct engagement with the user base: for example, there's no mention of the participation in the conference

All of the above. The nonexistent representation at notable crypto conferences such as Consensus is perhaps indicative of a lack of willingness by Steemit Inc to stand up to thorough scrutiny from the

All good. Just pointing out that similar questions are being asked by some in the EOS community as well. And rightfully so, considering the precedent set on Steem with the current governance structure.

Great post. I just wanted to add that I see this as potentially being an issue with EOS as well. The Witnesses on Steem are essentially synonymous with the Block Producers on EOS. I don't see much discussion

Yet Steemit Inc is spearheading the roll out of SMTs. And for that, they are responsible.

What a mess this platform has become. The CEO himself hasn't bothered posting on here in over a month. What does that suggest about the future of this place? I see almost daily developmental updates about

This platform is inextricably tied to the perception of the Steem blockchain and its value in the overall crypto space. As long as it remains stagnant in its development, nothing the Witnesses do is of

Yeah conversion costs are a set back - I'm sure there will be another market run for Steem and SBDs whenever SMTs are launched, though developmental updates have been few and far between, which is

Considering the latest controversy surrounding Facebook and its user data, I believe that the time is right for the roll out of a social media platform of some sort on a blockchain through which accountability

I went ahead and tweeted a link to your post because it warrants greater visibility and recognition. As it clearly conveys, the manner in which the rewards distribution system on this platform can be abused

In the long run, better compliance management will ensure the sustainability of the crypto market. Checks and balances are needed, though many will continue to dismiss this as FUD; the reality is that

Your proposal is a refreshing call for change in hopes of salvaging the first mover advantage that Steemit has as a blockchain-based social and blogging platform. One thing is for certain: the current

It is unfortunate. Quality oversight is terribly lacking on this platform.

Can't say I blame you if you decide to walk away from this mess, though I and other users value the consideration you've shown towards calling for sustainable improvements and better oversight. In a twisted

His senseless and sensationalist technical analysis via posts made multiple times a day gives traders that successfully and objectively assess price action a bad rep.

Not by accident! Enjoy it, while it's still worth something!

No doubt. We will see what becomes of this enterprise. I have a small stake and am willing to watch it all go up in smoke, if only to say that I was a part of the experimental journey! Keep up the great

Aside from comments, I haven't posted original content to this platform in over two months. Keep up the good fight, though it seems few with sizeable influence are doing so. I don't know how SMTs are going