SwissClive
@swisscliveI am an independant thinker who wants to improve the world. I am not a fan of fiat currency and I enjoy discussing the relative merits of other asset classes.
Resource Credits
Available
Used
Created
2017-08-18 17:02
RSS Feed
$ 0.000
1
$ 0.000
0
RE: We are not alone. The Universe is teeming with life, much of it far more intelligent and advanced than mankind
I read the article about Stephen Hawking’s words in the Mirror. I seriously doubt he would have said “replying to aliens is a bad idea”. If he said it, then he was joking, and the paper has reported it
RE: We are not alone. The Universe is teeming with life, much of it far more intelligent and advanced than mankind
Using numbers proposed by scientists, (as referenced in the Wikipedia article on the Drake Equation), suggest that the Milky Way galaxy currently contains 15'600'000 currently active intelligent life forms
RE: We are not alone. The Universe is teeming with life, much of it far more intelligent and advanced than mankind
Good point. Mankind is not ready yet for the discovery. If we can discover alien intelligence, then it disrupts the beliefs of most of mankind. How hard was it to accept the "Round" Earth discovery,
RE: We are not alone. The Universe is teeming with life, much of it far more intelligent and advanced than mankind
As I said, if God created life on earth, why would he stop at just one planet. If you were growing flowers in your garden, you would not stop at just one seed. I will therefore argue that if God created
RE: We are not alone. The Universe is teeming with life, much of it far more intelligent and advanced than mankind
I would love to try and find MY solution to the Drake equation. According to the Wikipedia article you linked: The Drake equation is a probabilistic argument used to estimate the number of active,
RE: We are not alone. The Universe is teeming with life, much of it far more intelligent and advanced than mankind
Thanks @freedomshift for your comments. I see you don’t agree with many or most of my points, and that’s fine. If I get you, the key point is that you don’t really agree with, is the academic view that