(Answer: Rikk, Yaju, and Samaj and Atharva Sanghinithas; Not of others.
(Answer) Look! In the conclusion of the beginning chapter of the book, the word Vedas is written from the Sanatan and Brahmin has not written anywhere in the beginning or end of the book. And in Nirukta-
ITiti Nigmo Bhavati Iti Brahmanam ..
Chadobrahmaniyi tectonics -This is a potential formula.
It is also clear from this that Vedas and Brahmins are the explanations. If you want to see something special in this, then see me in 'Rigveda Bhasha Bhashaika'. There can be no word of this verse as opposed to many of the evidence there. Because those who believe, Vedas can never become Sanatan because in the Brahmin books there are many sages of the history of Maharishi and Rajadi written and the history is written after the birth of theirs. The text also occurs after the birth of him. There is no history of anybody in the Vedas, but the particular word used to use that word to get the sense of wisdom. The context of a person's noun or special story is not in the Vedas.
