There are no more tunnels left in Gaza, they've all been destroyed, I don't know where he's getting his news but that's a pretty common established fact now.
A point of contention here is when he said the decision to withhold food a couple months ago is likely a war crime, but plays the same propaganda game by picking the times story of the ill child of which they used to show a starving child, asking why isn't the other child starving. One child not starving doesn't mean that in other areas, that children aren't starving after going two months without food. It could also mean that this mother, having a ill child, gets medical care and the family is prioritized based on medical need and more than likely being maintained in an area where supplies are still getting through. It's hardly imageable that such a ill child would even still be alive after two months of starving unless they were close to a place still receiving resources. It's also completely possible within the realm of all the churching of the propaganda presses, the whole picture was faked to sow seeds of doubts into people's mind's the honesty and integrity of what is being said going on, and that no one in Gaza can be trusted for what's being said.
When he talks about why Israel doesn't just wipe Gaza/Palestinians off the map, which they are totally capable of, there are many aspects to that, and one of those aspects which he speaks of is totally true, the maniacs, or another slice within the so called democracy that would have no problem with that what so ever. Years ago this was heavily talked about by Netanyahu in regards to those individuals who would absolutely destroy the temple mound if they had a chance and rebuild the temple that, biblically, will start the end of the world. His argument was who would want to set into motion the end of the world. On the other hand, retrospectively, in my opinion, if it didn't set the end of the world into motion, being one of the strongest held beliefs biblically, what happens when or if a belief as strong as that ends up being a fallacy, the proof of the start of everything they've been indoctorinated to believe may be untrue, the seed that sows doubt. Which would bring us back to what Elon said, "and it's remarkable what humans are capable of if they're fed falsehoods from when thy are children", which brings us back around to why Israel doesn't just obliviate Gaza/Palestinians to death, because there would be no one left, there would be no example(s) set, therefore it becomes much more concerning moving forward among groups of people who hate each other to the extent you see in the ME, if you obliviate people off the face of the earth due to their behaviors/beliefs, who is next if it becomes that simple of a solution, just get rid of them all. In regards to why Israel even allowed Hamas to exist, it goes back to that bigger foe on your border argument. At 13:00 minutes into this video, listen to what the guy says, and he's right, after thirty years of "supposed" peace between Israel and Jordan, maybe it's time to try something new, because peace only exist in the words of government officials, but it doesn't exist between the people.

That brings it back full throttle to exactly how Jared Kushner framed it in his interview with Al Jazeera, "Time To Try Something New", I mean really, I have a really hard time with people who can't understand exactly what he was talking about and what it means. I mean really, how hard is that?