The difference in trading volume is around 1000x though, when the difference in amount in circulation is more like 15x, and even less of a ratio when considering only liquid HIVE. But I don't believe most

For now I think most are happy with the 10%. Going forward I don't know.

Location in profile listed as India. Probably lower cost of living. Can't count on that 10% forever though, it is a variable rate depending on conditions.

Up until recently (last decade or so), inflation was the 'blockchain transaction fee' for the USD. If you kept your USD 'staked' in bonds or even just a savings or money market account, you would make

It was a DHF project that used DHF funds to buy and convert HBD, to help restore the peg at a time when HBD was chronically undervalued. Upon conclusion of the project the remaining funds were burned.

The fee part can't come back. Let's assume HIVE = $1 100 HIVE->95 HBD (5% fee deducted and burned) 95 HBD->95 HIVE (no fee in this direction) 5 HIVE burned. If the price changes, the conversion rate

HIVE to HBD conversions is another burn (5% of the amount converted)

I don't know what you mean by bad price but you can easily buy <$1 on the internal market nearly all the time. And buy a lot. The stabilizer buys $80K per day consistently, every single day, and there

The highest real liquidity is probably on the internal market. $10K or even higher trades happen all the time (I've seen $50K). It's not quite on-demand, you have to be willing to wait either as a maker

Talk to them, get a quote, pitch funding to cover the cost on DHF. That's how this works. There's no one "in charge" who is supposed to do it. If there isn't one single person in the community

There's no "reason" to hold millions in any of the top 100 cryptos that I can think of, other than that you think the value will go up. None of them have "real world" value commensurate

Better case for this after increasing the supply cap above 10% in my view. As things stand we have not hit the cap due to high demand (the HIVE price has always increased, moving the cap away, which is

Upvotes were excessive from my point of view of what I saw so I made a modest downvote to express my opinion. Nothing wrong with the post, and it is still getting significant rewards.

Downvotes spread more widely would indeed help with some cases, since then getting downvotes would not be so devastating to rewards (most content would have some so the zero-sum aspect would mean it would

On that same post I pointed out how the "free upvote" is basically just a nerf to downvotes (those getting downvoted, whether justified or not, can use the "free upvote" as a sort of

By my reading of the context, he's not talking about DPoS or the code base, but the social layer. What we have now is a bit different (e.g. free downvotes) from what Dan "invented" (to what extent

Was there a study or an analysis on why 10% would be chosen over any other percentage, or was it just an arbitrary number to test the water? There was no study. It was an arbitrary number picked by Steemit.

Not sure why this is reposted.

HBD interest is paid only on savings, and is paid into the savings balance. It is paid the first time any transaction updating the savings balance occurs at least 30 days after the last interest payment.

Wow, what about the long term, can images become a problem? I would think so. Who is paying to store them once the content referencing them is long forgotten, and the users posting them may even be dead?