The government has no interest in your health.
Did you get to see the movie vaxxed? It was to be shown at the film festival but pulled due to big pharma threats.
"Controversial Film linking vaccines, autism pulled from Houston film festival"
Whilst governments are pretending lockdowns are for the good of all, the truth is quite the opposite.
Nobody is talking about the amount of suicides caused by them. Nobody is talking about the amount of jobs lost. Nobody is talking about how many elderly people died with and of a broken heart. Isolated in retirement homes and or hospitals.
Here just like the UK nobody was allowed to visit the frail, elderly people that were suffering in said institutions.
Getting rid of pensioners frees up money from the government pension pool. Useless eaters they are termed by the resentful people in power.
That was the target audience for the vaccine trial here and in the UK. It is admitted to be a trial and one that runs until 2023.
Big pharma can not be sued for any adverse events, injuries or reactions.
At the same time as they were targeted both here and in the UK. Disabled people were too.
Again these people are considered a drain on the system.
Nil by mouth and do not resuscitate.
At the start of this "event201"
People in the UK - first over 60 then reduced to over 45, were sent forms to sign from their local doctors. (DNR)
DNR is a do not resuscitate form.
It means what it says. If you are ill or suffer a heart attack or other life threatening event you are simply left to die with no attempt made to keep you alive.
My mother signed one against my advise.
I know here they have used and still are the nil by mouth for the elderly and that includes water.
We can live for weeks or months possibly with no food, but not without water.
Is that considered a caring government any of the above?
Whilst we are supposed to believe lockdowns are for our own good, just writing the above highlights how much it is not for our own good.
If we mix in the damage suffered and done to our children then the proof is the total opposite of what we are told to believe.
Event 201 was Held by Bill Gates and co in October 2019 and was a simulation event for convid1984 that went live in the following January, with those images of people dead in the streets in Wuhan China.
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/
Nothing to see here, no conspiracy hey?
This must have taken many years of planning.
I know the world bank did a pandemic bond back in 2017.
They have tried to insure a pandemic with bonds in advance so some people can get very rich. The longer it lasts the more money they get.
The first pandemic bond
Launched by the World Bank in June 2017, the pandemic bond was the first of its kind, transferring pandemic risk in developing countries to the financial markets. Its aim was to provide financial support to the Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility (PEF), a financing mechanism launched in 2016.
The PEF is intended to help fund the fight against cross-border, large-scale outbreaks in the world’s poorest countries. It was set up by the World Bank and raised funds through 2 different routes: the cash window and the insurance window.
https://actuaries.blog.gov.uk/2021/03/02/pandemic-bonds-what-are-they-and-how-do-they-work/
"Why World Bank’s Controversial Pandemic Bonds Didn’t Function as Hoped."
In late January 2015, just after the deadliest outbreak of Ebola in history, then-World Bank President Jim Yong Kim stood in front of a group of Georgetown University students and professors to introduce a new approach to fighting pandemics.
Fresh from the annual gathering of power brokers and policy makers in Davos, Kim described a new type of financial product – “pandemic bonds” – that he hoped would persuade private investors to swell the World Bank’s coffers. Quoting former U.S. Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, Kim said: “Investing in health is the right thing to do ethically and morally, but it’s also the right thing to do if you can do basic arithmetic.”
Five years later, Summers had some different words for Kim, though you probably won’t hear the former World Bank president repeat them in public. The approach was “a dumb idea,” Summers said in a February 2020 email to a Harvard colleague seen by Bloomberg News. Modeled on catastrophe debt that pays insurance claims on natural disasters, the program was too complicated and ultimately unnecessary, he suggested, “like me insuring my toaster.”
https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/international/2020/12/10/593490.htm
Shake your money maker.
Some people have become stinking filthy rich over the last year, Gates, Bezos and I would suggest big pharma share holders plus anyone that invested in the plandemic bonds in 2017.
Everything I have written here is very easily researched with multiple links via any browser. None of it is conjecture or in the conspiracy theorist realm. It is based in reality.
And I have not con-spired with anyone. I know others in power have.
Is this event 2020 2030 on steroids?
Carbon neutral and all that jazz?
We are that carbon producer it would seem that the resentful freeloaders in government want to end or get rid of.
We have a choice for now to say no. We may not always have said choice.
Here government rumors suggest they want curfews for the un-vaccinated against convid.
If that is introduced it will not end there. It will be extended to not being allowed to shop. No air travel. Border restrictions and more.
With only 1 in 4 here taking up the free trial that leaves over 30 million people facing vaccine discrimination.
That I would suggest would bring the corporate shopping centers to their knees.
30 million not welcome, imagine cinemas? They were dead before last year. Taking 30 million out of the possible viewing audience would end them for good.
Football stadiums here are often nowhere near full. My local stadium I visit often is 3/4 empty. Taking them 30 million away would cripple them too.
As much as gov want to threaten the above, the economic consequences for corporations would be massive. And if it were to be put into an act of law I would suggest said law would be unlawful anyway.
With corporations having more power than any single government I see no way they would be willing to accept it.
So to me it is simply propaganda and fear.
Either way take not much notice. Live your life in happiness and wear a smile.
Acts of kindness to strangers even if only a smile may save a life you just never know.
In trying times like we now live in, it becomes more important than ever to refuse to be divided.
Together we are strong, divided we are not.
Have a superb day ahead and have some fun, hugs and smiles.