RE: RE: Consider HP on an Aggregate Community Level - [Alien Art Community Meta.]
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Consider HP on an Aggregate Community Level - [Alien Art Community Meta.]

Words
230
Reading
2 min
Listen
Play
6y

I thought about this a bit more, and I think the easiest visual metaphor is using the Minnow -> Whale symbols, but only for ACTIVE HP within a community.

  • Community members must be posting / curating.
  • And Of those members, how many minnows, how many Dolphins, How Many Orcas?

So you have this "School of Fish" or "Pod of Dolphins" etc, where the total HP Score is broken up into

  • Number of Active Dolphins
  • Number of Active Minnows

So, a new community started by a minnow, is going to be ranked really fledgling, but the rankings for art communities based on their Reward Pool Distribution Potential, will probably push more people to be a part of that community.

In a sense, Joining OnchainArt [~450 Active Members], seems to promise more than joining Sketchbook [~350 Active Members].

But the real financial determining value is not how many active users there are, but what their cumulative / active / applied HP is.

.:.

Beyond that, there's something critical that I mentioned on the Peakd post recently, and that is an integration between NFTShowroom and Peakd.

Adding that utility to the art UI will increase the bandwidth of collectors and NFTShowroom participants.

I'm curious what would happen to the ecosystem if I was able to distribute, sell, gift, trade, gamify, display NFTs as easily as I can include an image in my comments,

@rootdraws: I thought about | Ecency