“Insanity is doing the same thing, over and over again, but expecting different results.” Consistency is not growth, it just looks that way relative to someone backsliding. It's a plateau at best. If someone

I know everyone wants Hive to grow but people need to realize the dangers of propping up people who are completely inept at marketing. There's fraud and false advertising issues as well as the chance it

You did when you asked people to help you spam people's comments to shill for Hive. and again in this context although this one you expressed being open to other ideas. Which is why I engaged the question

That sounds fun

Dogpiling is bad and unethical. It's also highly ineffective. If you look at YouTube comments, this is a common tactic used by scammers. People will recommend someone's service and a bunch of other people

I would say that crypto people are more rigid and narrow minded than people from similarish groups like forex traders or WSB people. People claim to learn but its from such a shallow pool that its unlikely

Usually if something is free, it means that you are the commodity. Like when people have FREE accounts somewhere but then the business model sells advertising space to those users.

I'll take your free money

Fortnite running so low on ideaz that they have to ripoff Sim City. Nice.

Maybe we need to have some kind of antisocial credit score similar to the untrending report in order to attempt offset harm done to free speech and individualism advocates.

Information is currency

This year I'd like to roast more bad crypto projects. It'd be nice see crypto projects with some depth and authenticity to them and it seems like the culture needs to shift a bit for the space to become

I wouldn't put Hive on a pedestal the way you do. Hive being what it is amplifies the problems I've stated. Universities are designed with a form of exclusivity. I don't want to dismiss them because they

The irony of some of your statements are poetic to me. I can simplify for you. The post was trying to make it sound like everyone who trades is just guessing and getting lucky or using some form of mysticism

Markets like these get split into Pool A and Pool B speculators where Pool A ultimately profits and Pool B ultimately loses. The entire market is driven on this and Pool A people will rarely share valuable

No I read the entire post before commenting. I was also trying to engage in a provocative but polite way then got a little insulted by the hand-waving you did saying I was nitpicking so I came back with

How do I lose the war? It's your thesis statement that I'm refuting and if you took that idea outside of the echo chamber of sycophants here into a real marketplace of ideas, you would find your idea

I think that instead of making decentralization into a meaningless nothingburger, it would be better to draw a comparison to pH scale. There are weak acids and strong acids but we don't call it a base