Affective component
In general, it generates an identity response or complete aversion, as well as factors influencing what is good to say: I love my country in general provoked the affirmative response in men and women of all age groups, I think that There was no response with a scale, people inferred that negative was to say that they hated the country, this being a feeling that affects their positive assessment as a person.
I love being abroad, nor do I miss Mexico in general provoked the negative response in men and women of all age groups, and although in another question in which it was raised in another way (When I am in a foreign country I miss a lot to Mexico) some people doubted since they have not been in a foreign country, in this when saying or strange to Mexico the negative response was provoked, it could be because not surprising is like not valuing or not wanting the country that shelters you what It is probably considered ungrateful and bad to express.
I am indifferent to see the Mexican flag in sports competitions or civic events. It is a situation similar to the previous one although it should be noted a situation in: I am proud of the history, customs and Mexican traditions a person was of his affective component to analyze it from the cognitive referring that he does not know the Mexican customs and traditions, since these according to him they were imposed by the Spaniards and therefore can not feel proud if he is not aware of them.
Behavioral component:
I do not do anything for my country because I do not believe in it. The response was negative in general, in men and women and in all age groups. I give my life for the country is a clear example that the generational differences, the man and woman of 15-25 years are in disagreement, only the man of 26-40 years is in agreement reflecting the character that was reinforced in the male stereotypes about the protection, the courage and the contempt towards who is cowed; finally both the man and the woman older than 42 years affirmed that if they give their lives for their country, this could be due to the closest antecedents in which a stronger patriotism survived without globalization having impacted so much compared to the present.
Cognitive component: Foreign countries are better than Mexico in general, both by age groups and men and women disagreed, you are not sure because, maybe it is because you do not have a reference as to whether they are better or worse, but if a generalization is made, the most common is that people think that putting them in agreement leads to misinterpretation as Mexico is the worst and worst in every way.
The Homeland is First in this case there was only difference in terms of age groups, the youngest between 15 and 25 years that are more related to globalization and that could be that less patriotism is inculcated as something paramount. homeland as only a land without assessing or being aware of the social freedoms and security that so much has been struggled to maintain and progress to improve the quality of life of all the people in general; On the other hand, the other age groups in both women and men seem to have a more ingrained patriot sense or are aware that it would be the homeland if it were in the hands of another nation that controlled it and somehow enslaved it.
Who tries to alienate or tax the national territory or contribute to its dismemberment is a traitor to the country in this statement denotes what is most related to the homeland, ie a territory national territory, which is safeguarded by its defense or more clearly it is given by personal interests depriving of the individual liberties and the rights that the country promotes, clearly it is seen as a traitor to this person; It is not to mention that all in general, men and women and any age group answered affirmatively on this occasion.