They really did a number on this generation. It's almost like there was some sort of sinister agenda to pacify the youth and keep them content with mediocrity. Baby-boomers, rich foreigners and Jews run amok while the youth drown in debt and hold off on having families because it isn't economically feasible anymore.
these fucking harpies can't even cook or make proper eye contact smh
There's a plethora of evidence to suggest that smart phones and social media websites are actually dangerous – unlimited internet stimulation might actually be harmful to the developing mind. Some people might think "oh well, thats just the way things are" and shrug it off like It's not a big deal. Maybe they're right, I should stop being such a "Luddite" and chill out.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite
the Luddite's did nothing wrong
I'm 21, I had facebook since I was in the 6th of 7th grade. I'm pretty sure I grew out of Beyblades and yu-gi-oh cards but I was still very young and impressionable. In retrospect, I would never allow my child to have social media, not until he's of a certain age. This shits hella dangerous.
the perfect age to introduce them to the CIA's social engineering program
Men of broader intellect can still frequent facebook/social media without falling prey to Jewish subversion. It's the psychologically sensitive, the women and the children (not all women) that need to be protected. They're being subject to something that we have never seen before. Never before has the common man been able to get unlimited amounts of information at the speed of light, just by pressing a button. Where is this information coming from? Who's the gatekeeper of said information? Could Mark Zuckerberg be considered an "information Czar"? Is their an insidious agenda to influence people with social media, or am I just a crazy conspiracy theorist?
facebook is Edward Bernays wet dream
Here is a scientific paper describing an experiment in which researchers attempted to alter the moods of Facebook users by secretly manipulating the messages they saw. It's called:
"Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks" (the title alone sounds dangerously Orwellian)
http://www.pnas.org/content/111/24/8788.full
Emotional states can be transferred to others via emotional contagion, leading them to experience the same emotions as those around them. Emotional contagion is well established in laboratory experiments (1), in which people transfer positive and negative moods and emotions to others. Similarly, data from a large, real-world social network collected over a 20-y period suggests that longer-lasting moods (e.g., depression, happiness) can be transferred through networks as well
Makes sense. I get depressed when I spend too much time reading mainstream news, I really don't care much for trannies, minority whining or refugees for that matter. I'm not surprised that emotions are infectious. It would be a shame if (((someone))) figured out a way to weaponize this.
Mark Zuckerberg CEO of Facebook
On Facebook, people frequently express emotions, which are later seen by their friends via Facebook’s “News Feed” product (8). Because people’s friends frequently produce much more content than one person can view, the News Feed filters posts, stories, and activities undertaken by friends. News Feed is the primary manner by which people see content that friends share. Which content is shown or omitted in the News Feed is determined via a ranking algorithm that Facebook continually develops and tests in the interest of showing viewers the content they will find most relevant and engaging. One such test is reported in this study: A test of whether posts with emotional content are more engaging.
Just checked my newsfeed – It's Katy perry smokey eye bitches posting selfies and recipe videos of food they're never going to cook.
The experiment manipulated the extent to which people (N = 689,003) were exposed to emotional expressions in their News Feed. This tested whether exposure to emotions led people to change their own posting behaviors, in particular whether exposure to emotional content led people to post content that was consistent with the exposure—thereby testing whether exposure to verbal affective expressions leads to similar verbal expressions, a form of emotional contagion. People who viewed Facebook in English were qualified for selection into the experiment. Two parallel experiments were conducted for positive and negative emotion: One in which exposure to friends’ positive emotional content in their News Feed was reduced, and one in which exposure to negative emotional content in their News Feed was reduced. In these conditions, when a person loaded their News Feed, posts that contained emotional content of the relevant emotional valence, each emotional post had between a 10% and 90% chance (based on their User ID) of being omitted from their News Feed for that specific viewing. It is important to note that this content was always available by viewing a friend’s content directly by going to that friend’s “wall” or “timeline,” rather than via the News Feed. Further, the omitted content may have appeared on prior or subsequent views of the News Feed. Finally, the experiment did not affect any direct messages sent from one user to another.
No wonder the kids are offing themselves in record numbers these days. Jews are playing God with their lives via facebook algorithms. What a time to be alive.
Now, lets talk about the type of people conducting the experiment.
We have :
-Adam D. I. Kramer
-Jamie E. Guillory (isn't really that interesting)
-Jeffrey T. Hancock
Adam D.I. Kramer looks like a mad scientist tbh. Kramer is also a Jewish surname.
Apparently Jeffrey T. Hancock works for the DOD
https://www.rt.com/usa/169848-pentagon-facebook-study-minerva/
The attack on Facebook looks set to worsen as it was discovered that one of the authors of the platform’s mind study, Jeffrey T. Hancock of Cornell University, also received funding from the Pentagon’s so-called Minerva Research Initiative to conduct a similar study entitled ‘Modeling Discourse and Social Dynamics in Authoritarian Regimes’.
The Pentagon-funded Minerva program provides cash awards to everyone from “single investigators to large multi-university consortia,” according to its website and includes “researchers from 32 academic institutions, including six non-US universities and four industry or non-profit organizations.”
Minerva? Like, the Owl thing they worship at Bohemian grove?
Meanwhile, Cornell University participated in another study under the Minerva Research Initiative (and supervised by the US Air Force Office of Scientific Research) that looks to predict “the dynamics of social movement mobilization and contagions."
The project hopes to foresee "the critical mass [tipping point]" of social unrest and upheaval by studying their "digital traces" from a number of recent events, including the 2011 Egyptian revolution and the 2013 Gezi Park protests in Turkey.
AKA: "we need to keep tabs on dissenters and crush that shit so it doesn't get out of hand"
At the same time, Twitter feeds and conversations will be examined "to identify individuals mobilized in a social contagion and when they become mobilized."
Fuck! I've been practising my noose tying skills for the "day of reckoning" but it looks like these people already found a way to quell dissent and sabotage organized rebellion. Damn.
you'll never get to hang traitors like your ancestors did
In conclusion, Facebook is tool for the government to monitor, study and control large swaths of the global population. The one study I cited was 3 years old, it barely scratches to surface of what's going on. This one study just shows how slight adjustments and algorithm tampering can influence you considerably, whether you know it or not. Tech giants and Intelligence agencies wield more power then sovereign governments – if you hold dissenting views, then you're probably in their crosshairs. You may have noticed how Facebook algorithms show you "like minded" posts on the newsfeed, that means you only see what you already agree with. People who hold dissenting views are now closed off to the rest of the world. When the information is compartmentalized an echo-chamber forms. You have now become virtually "quarantined" putting a halt to the "subversive" information you share. This polarization helps them pit people against each other. While you squabble over identity politics on facebook, they are laughing in their ivory towers.
