The blame game implies that everyone has to be blamed or People blame each other. . Instead of asking how the market performs, the people who don't get a chance to buy or sell should blame the deadbeats who don't sell. At first glance, it would seem that these are the right questions. When a business closes or produces less, people should blame the business. In an organization’s performance leaders are to blame or they blame each other for bad performances.
This is good and bad. The bad part is that, when it comes to being an effective communicator, most leaders on the program really want to avoid blaming others for their errors. But the good part is that, when it comes to being an effective communicator, most leaders on the program really want to avoid blaming others for their errors. Even when they're facing the issue of all the things that they could have done better to increase our activity and funding. It's part of the reason for the overall softness of our leadership, and in particular the leadership of the service dept
We've already discussed the idea that we blame others, or ourselves, when we screw up and try to avoid the consequences. There's another factor that comes into play, too. Is the other person telling the truth? For example, if you call a woman "mean," "ugly," or "delusional" in private, what does this mean for the relationship? If you accuse someone of beating you up, what does this mean for your emotionally.
Anyone at one level will jump at any opportunity to tell you you don't understand your people.You simply must understand your people, and if you don't understand, you don't know what you are talking about, get with your organization and learn what you need to know. And lastly...if you don't know who your teammates are, how can you set strategy? At least the folks who will be helping you organize the event, care! If you have a problem with them that needs addressing, they will hear you, but they won't become your allies.
It's great sometimes when people "blame" others for their mistakes. If a leader takes a personally identified hit and responds with anger, people believe that the leader is "sugarcoating" the issue. The leader's weakness is being too hard on himself or herself and it's taken as an individual weakness when a group of leaders somehow collectively suffer a collective hit.
Who started the game of pointing fingers? And why? Why is it that a single illness destroys lives, and brings ruin to families, communities, and entire continents? The answer is simple: Those who take the blame are usually those who need the blame most. Instead of being honest and looking for solutions, those who take responsibility are left empty and saddled with the blame. In short, blaming others is a cop-out. That's because truth is always found in the eyes of the honest person, whether or not others are willing to admit it.
