The "science" is settled. Only these people who agree have the real "science". Other claims against the settled "science" are not science. Anyone who goes against the "science" is not scientific. They are wrong. They are looking for attention. They are conspiracy nutjobs.
Everything the WHO, government media and their approved "scientific experts" say about COVID-19 is science, or is scientific. Those who go against that narrative are just wrong and are dangerous. They shouldn't be allowed to speak. Only idiots go against the "science" of COVID-19. They are COVID-deniers and should be ridiculed or locked up.
It's just like global warming "Science"... errrr... I mean climate change "science". It's settled. Those who stand against the settled "science are "climate deniers". They are dangerous quacks.
Don't pay attention to the contrary evidence or opinions. They are trouble makers who can't face reality. The "science" says otherwise.
Cigarettes are safe. DDT is safe. We have scientists who say so. Trust us. We know best. We have degrees and we are looking out for you. Ask your doctor, they recommend cigarettes.
Trust the doctors who tell you it's good to smoke cigarettes. Trust the nurses who spray your kids with DDT. They care about you. They wouldn't do anything to harm you. After all, they are the experts and authorities. You can't trust what the non-experts and non-authorities say.
After all, there is no science proving these things cause harm. Therefore, they are safe. Anyone who claims they are harmful is not scientific unless they have science to prove what they say. If you come up with science to say it's harmful, we will come up with science to say it's safe.
Anyone can collect data. Anyone can think and speak about data. Let reality demonstrate it. When a cheap drug effectively treats something, it's demonstrated. When wearing a face covering is measured to decrease oxygen and increase carbon dioxide and doesn't significantly reduce droplet entering, exiting or reduce transmission of a virus, it's demonstrated. Just because an authority or expert says otherwise, or that it "may", "maybe", "might", "possibly", or "could", doesn't negate previous studies that show a demonstrable result.