it only adds to the confusion that kids are now schooled in so-called "sexual matters" by a government agenda that is worldwide, completely ignores and negates the energetic and biological qualities of men and women, tosses it all into a tumbler and then markets that as progress and tolerance. only parents should decide how when and what their children should learn in this regard.

it is dangerous indoctrination at a fragile age (not when the kid's natural question comes up) while the real quality of initiation (meaning introducing ideas and concepts) can and should only come by those we have closest ties with (our family), rather than public school systems who teach an outright life-adversarial curriculum.

i feel also that in that modernity we have all but lost the capacity to differentiate, we mix up concepts and ideas all the time. everything has been watered down and confused so it's nearly impossible to see actuality any longer. to me what is taught in many western schools today is way more questionable than allowing a child to witness sex between his parents after it has clearly communicated that interest in learning about it. not before. not when it turns 3 (or whenever kindergarten deems it right). and not in the life-affronting way these concepts are introduced today in public.

saying 'kids should probably witness sex first and only between their parents' will sound like modern blasphemy to people, outright unacceptable. but then preschoolers are taught about the most unnatural sex practices against their (and their parents) will and that then is somehow tolerant and modern. or kids get on the inernet and see the most horrendous videos and try that with their peers thinking that is the way adults "do that sort of thing".

it really is quite remarkable what a minefield sexuality is today, and yet: how audacious some trends exist and persist that directly attack the most vulnerable members of society constantly without much public outcry.