RE: RE: @Smooth, fuck off.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: @Smooth, fuck off.

Words
201
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
5y

Even though I have issues with some characters/and or groups on this blockchain, I still think it has a lot of potential and it has a lot going for it, other than a blogging space as we are now witnessing. Some of the development that is ongoing is definitely a huge positive. There are many positives, amongst the few negatives that overshadow it all.

I don't know much about Tarazkp, other than he writes well and clearly, but I one-hundred-percent disagree with his whole notion of don't fight (the downvotes), just let it happen. It's a massive turn-off to the platform.

These guys don't care because they are in a comfortable and influential position around here, and would rather hood-wink/lie about the reasons why it happens - it is simply not in their interests to say anything other than what you quoted above.

They have an elitist mentality - the same mentality they accuse the influential powers in the real world of using against the masses. This is no different. They are playing god with their stake and influence on a blockchain where they control content and rewards distribution.

Trying to sell the idea that it's not censorship is totally absurd.

@palikari123: Even though I | Ecency