We are responsible for our true ambition, not the more or less deceptive appearances we attribute to ourselves or to others in the affairs area ... However, we are responsible for being able to discuss on our own in some way and, at least at some point, conscious and desired work, What makes us right or guilty is this profound and relatively persistent desire that is nothing more than the systematization of our tendencies and the resulting metaphysical unity, and it is not a superficial or coincidental desire that sometimes determines any of our actions on the contrary. This is what the general understanding always admits. A hard word spoken by a man known as good-hearted is less than that of another, because this behavior can be attributed to a temporary physical pain in the moment of impatience and is not seen as an expression of his true feelings. In general, the stronger systematizing of the constituent elements of I, the more we are responsible for the lesser the necessity of "numen" is subjected to nature: and in every particular case, our responsibility is to make our actions complete, . This is why we must bring a correction to what we just said: responsibility is lost where the thought is lacking. A subject who does not have the roots of thinking can not be responsible for anything; but is conscious of the repetitive action of conscious and thoughtful willingness to take on a natural structure and character, and a subject who is influenced by and acting in harmony with it, is responsible for as much and perhaps more as he has done in the long run.
