No, man, I appreciate it. I joined a little late, so sorry if I'm coming a little bit cold, but so far, the discussions have been amazing.
Dave, it's been amazing listening to your viewpoints, and I guess unique positioning on everything related to sovereignty, user experience, and crypto in general. Yeah, from our perspective, it feels like we're coming from the same spot in terms of the viewpoint from Tokyo eco and all of that.
I did have a question on sovereignty, and I love the way that you guys are striving around optionality right now, the options, the binary right, as you guys are mentioning,g the keys are stored in a shed under a rock or or you kno w?On your wife's phone or somewhere like that? Not on your wife's phone, but you know what I mean. People do that. And at the moment, it's a massive sacrifice basically that you need to not havea sacrifice. But it's a big thing that people need to undertake for the full level of sovereignty. And I love the way that.
We're effectively growing the lines here with Eker and saying, OK, give up a little bit, a tiny bit and we'll we'll, you know, sort of make the experience a whole lot better. My question does lead into that from a technical perspective that and you may have mentioned this earlier, but what are you doing with key management and yeah, could you talk a bit more technically about how that works so.
I mean, there's a, there's a lot of nuance here, but I think a good way to explain the novelty and, and the real like level of optionality will be to maybe take take just Bitcoin custody as an example and explain what Ek enables and how that wasn't possible before and the different levels of optionality.