The use of firearms is already regulated. Isn't that true? After all it's illegal to murder. Right? So the
issue cannot be about "regulating the use of fire arms"?
I understand the desire to save innocent people, but disarming them just creates more soft targets. More soft targets equal more potential victims, not less.
Are you familiar with the story of Esther? Do you think Haman would have supported or opposed gun control among the Jews?