@nijeah - Who broke the blockchain ?

Words
734
Reading
4 min
Listen
Play
8y

2018-06-26 00:44:45

The nijeah@nijeah account started the first power down process of -1 VESTS.

2018-06-26 00:47:06

After the start of the power down process of first -2 VESTS and then -10,000,000,000 VESTS, the power down reaches its maximum of -1,000,000,000,000 VESTS, which is currently about -492,666,183,591 STEEM Power.

2018-07-03 00:47:00

The first payout of the Power Down process breaks the blockchain because it was a negative amount which was powered down so the blockchain didn't know how to handle it. There were any blocks produced at this point.

So far the problem has been solved and everything is running smoothly again. Witness Nodes updated to version 0.19.5, which solves the problem.
https://github.com/steemit/steem/releases/tag/v0.19.5


This is a brief description of what happened. You can read more posts on this topic by @jerc33, @bobinson, @holger80, @ironshield and even @steemitblog.
But there was an interesting point @isnochys' that caught my attention. It draws a connection between netuoso@netuoso and nijeah@nijeah. Both sent SBD to the same bittrex address.

So the question is, who is this guy, nijeah@nijeah?
[…]
This points to netuoso@netuoso

His answer says that he is not involved in this issue but his support for the user may have helped him to do this:

I do not own or run the nijeah@nijeah account. Several months back I helped the user with a couple scripts and answered a few questions on discord. I was compensated for my time.
[…]
They did contain automated vesting withdrawals so could be related.

So one question remains: Who is nijeah@nijeah ?

The history of nijeah@nijeah


The account was created by anonsteem@anonsteem on 2017-12-27 23:07:12. Since there is no STEEM transaction, it was created either with payment in LTC or in BTC. I don't see any possibility to get further information about the account holder here.

After creation, the account plagiarized haejin@haejin's contributions and was caught five times by Steemcleaners.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Since January 8, 2018, the account was inactive until it began to power down a negative amount.

The relation between nijeah@nijeah and netuoso@netuoso


As mentioned above they both transferred SBD to the same bittrex address. netuoso@netuoso's answer seems reasonable, but the question why nijeah@nijeah didn't send SBD directly makes it suspicious.

So I dug into nijeah@nijeah to find any evidence that keeps the account. Pretty quickly I went over to do some research on the accounts nijeah@nijeah delegates to. These accounts are grumpydog@grumpydog and wewt@wewt.

grumpydog@grumpydog is not very interesting. It was created by nijeah@nijeah and just upvoted nijeah@nijeah. So there is wewt@wewt left.

wewt@wewt - Another track pointing to netuoso@netuoso


wewt@wewt was created by msp3k@msp3k [1] and msp3k@msp3k was created by netuoso@netuoso [2]. Both accounts set netuoso@netuoso as proxy [3] , [4].
There are already two connections between netuoso@netuoso and wewt@wewt, the creator and the witness voting.
Also the upvoting scheme shows a clear picture:

AuthorNumber of Upvotes by wewt@wewt
netuoso@netuoso28
suheri@suheri7
chron@chron3
yandot@yandot2
emrebeyler@emrebeyler2
reko@reko2
26 more authors29

Around 38.5% of all Upvotes went to netuoso@netuoso.

The last connection I found between wewt@wewt and netuoso@netuoso was that wewt@wewt set netuoso@netuoso as withdraw vesting route [5]. This means that when wewt@wewt powers down VESTS, they automatically end up in the netuoso@netuoso account. You won't need to set this for every power down process manually.

When I completed all the research on wewt@wewt, I have some pretty hard evidence that this account belongs to netuoso@netuoso. And the account, most likely operated by netuoso@netuoso, has a delegation from nijeah@nijeah that broke the blockchain yesterday.


I contacted netuoso@netuoso on Discord and asked him a few questions but I didn't get an answer yet. As soon as I get an answer I will edit it into this post afterwards. Or maybe he wants to make a statement in the comments? I would also appreciate this way.

To make it clear. I don't want accuse netuoso@netuoso of crashing the blockchain but there are interesting relations between the two accounts which I investigated here. To put it into the words of isnochys@isnochys:

We don't have a smoking gun here, but at least a gun with maybe fingerprints on it.

netuoso@netuoso wrote an open letter in which he denies any owner ship of nijeah@nijeah.
https://steemit.com/drama/@netuoso/open-letter-to-the-harassers-and-anyone-else-paying-attention-re-blockchain-freeze


Image source: https://pixabay.com/de/hacker-cyber-kriminalit%C3%A4t-internet-2300772/

PS: On all 61 open Discord Server related to Steemit I joined, there is nowhere an account named nijeah@nijeah. But netuoso@netuoso got in contact with him on Discord…

@nijeah - Who broke the blockchain ? | Ecency