I should definitely get off discord and go to bed at a reasonable hour, because a few late nights eventually catches up pretty fast. That was an example of me being honest by telling the truth, again only I know this to be true, but upon further investigation you will be able to see how often I had interactions on discord, that would then be called evidence. This evidence also need to be verifiable, otherwise it will be nothing more than your word or opinion. Why can't we just take everyone's word, well because there are other people who lie. So in order to discover the truth there needs to be evidence to support it, making it true.
A statement that is true, is for example that water is wet, we can all go to the tap right now and confirm this to be true. Things that are not true, could be something like Russia hacking the American election, you're probably thinking "oh my gosh Mork, how could you say that?". Well because there is no evidence to support this claim, the truth can not be verified in this situation. The security company who investigated the hacked DNC servers, gave the authorities a report saying they had verified the evidence and it was undoubtedly Russia. So do we believe the word of a party that has allegiances to their client, or a company who has allegiances to the truth? Obviously someone is lying here, so the only logical step forward would be to allow the authorities to then verify the truth. The funny thing it that the DNC did not hand over their servers to the authorities, they refused.
"Therefore the vast majority of the people who affirm leftist beliefs think of their views as the only way to properly think about life." - Dennis Prager
**"So that’s circumstantial evidence that some Russian was involved or someone who wanted to make it look like a Russian was involved. That’s not the case for the material that we released." - Julian Assange **
If truth is unverifiable, the correct and honest way forward would be to acknowledge this. When this unverifiable truth is then called the complete and utter truth, and even questioning this narrative is met with hostility, it is then undoubtedly clear who is lying, Occam's razor. The end goal it seems is not truth in this situation but political power, and influence over the masses.
"Socialism has no moral justification whatsoever; poor people are not morally superior to rich people, nor are they owed anything by rich people simply because of their lack of success. Charity is not a socialist concept - it is a religious one, an acknowledgment of God's sovereignty over property, a sovereignty the Left utterly rejects." - Ben Shapiro
Join me tomorrow for more lessons on these really easy to understand concepts.
@princessmewmew• For those who love the the open road and the road less traveled follow 
• The reason I joined this platform was thanks to one guy, the infamous 
• One of the first blogs I ever read when I joined steemit, great content 
• If you love a good laugh and all things Star Wars follow 
@adsactly-witness for your witnesses here.