I'm sure you heard the phrase: "I hate math". It's ironic because math is such a fundamental field of study that helps shape the world we know today. Math is practically everywhere; architecture, applications in science, technology, etc. It's a field of study that is hated by many but utilized by all and it appears that plenty of individuals seem to forget how important this subject matter is.
So, why is it so hard to learn? Well consider that it may not be hard for you to learn but many students find math subjects difficult to understand. It's ironic because math is extremely logical and fundamental. It's one of the most concrete fields of study (take no offense my science people, you're concrete too).
Allow me to emphasize; in other subjects, especially in art related courses things can be defined as true or false depending on personal assumptions. In math, things are true or false by definition or law, unless there is an exception. In math we also have axioms which are assumed to be true; think of these axioms as statements that are "a given". A recognizable mathematical axiom would be something as simple as: a = a, where 'a' represents a real number. Obviously, a number will equal itself such as 1 = 1 because 1 does not equal 2; these fundamental statements are defined as axioms. These definite true / false values are what allows automation and mathematics to coincide. Since functions can be defined as true or false with 100% certainty, we are able to automate plenty of mathematical processes; perhaps, more recognizably: arithmetic operations.
Mathematics tries it's best to prevent any logical contradictions. In fact; a very popular proofing method used in Discrete Mathematics by Computer Scientist is proof by contradiction. This method is used to prove that a claim is false by trying to prove if the inverse relationship is true. If you cannot prove that the inverse relationship is true; most likely you ran into a logical contradiction, which means by proof of contraction since the inverse relationship cannot be proven true the claim must be false. The reason why this works is because in any claim the inverse relationship or opposite statement must hold true to form a balanced relationship. Here's a formal definition of what I said below:
So far it may seem that I have only provided evidence on why math shouldn't be hard to learn. I haven't directly answered the question: "Why is math so hard to learn?". Considering the evidence, we know that math is logical, fundamental, and everything is defined as true or false by law, yet many students still have trouble understanding math. A big part of that is due to how society operates and how many individual’s functions in their day-to-day lives. I cannot personally speak for other countries but here in the United States, math is not expressed enough in our everyday interactions.
Rather than understanding how something works we seem to only care about if it works. There is little to no critical thinking applied because all the critical thinking is already done for us. Math involves a great heap of analytical thinking and because the majority students lack in analytical skills they struggle heavily in math. Students want to believe their correct, and in other disciplines that can get away with that but in most STEM fields that will not work. A definition cannot be contradicted because you don't "like it". Scientists, Engineers and Mathematicians cannot assume on "what you meant" rather they can only know "what you said".
If society involved individuals to apply more critical thinking and placed a higher emphasis on STEM disciplines I can guarantee that STEM fields wouldn't be difficult for many. On the contrary I could assume that the inverse fields; fine arts would probably be more difficult! Many individuals find fine arts to be more interesting, and I do not oppose opinions but a big part of that is due to the implementation of fine arts within society. Fine arts have been integrated into society and is a big part of our everyday lives.
I do not reject the importance of fine arts, as I think it is a great relaxing field of study but more emphasis on math and science would surely see an increase in STEM related test scores. Because the emphasis on math and science is kept to a minimum, individuals who lack exposure are easily intimidated by the “complexity” behind math. The subject looks alien-like to them because they do not expose themselves to it in their everyday lives. I could almost bet that if math was commonly used in our everyday societal interactions, math wouldn’t be so hard to learn. Just like learning a new language the best way to kick start your skill in math is by consistently practicing and increasing exposure.
TL;DR: Math shouldn’t be hard to learn but it is actually one of the most difficult subjects for undergraduate students. Keep in mind it may not be hard for you (the reader) to understand but this could be due to your increased exposure within the field of study. Math being challenging is ironic considering that math is pure logic; things are defined as true or false by definition, not speculation. In art related courses objects can be defined as true or false by personal bias. In theory this should make art more complex and abstract, making it more difficult to understand art axioms but this is unfortunately not the case.
Unlike fine arts, exposure to math (or any STEM subjects) is kept to a minimum within everyday societal interactions. Notably, within the United States math isn’t viewed as an “interesting” topic therefore standard conversations usually do not involve math. Unless you’re studying or working in a STEM related field, no one is usually talking about algorithms, or complex functions for fun. This lack of exposure makes math intimidating for many individuals and develops a false stereotype that “math is hard”. Rather it is just a lack of experience within the subject which, consequently math hard to learn.
REFERENCES:
Note: A big thanks to 
